You are right that Congress has more control over the economy than the president does. However the President can set an agenda and drive legislation through Congress to effect their actions. Obama did this in an attempt to push through big dollar social programs and also put severe limits on business through bureaucratic red tape.

Trump is making a 180 degree turn to those policies by rolling back regulations and by pushing a pro business agenda in Congress (Tax reform). This ultimately has a great effect on how the economy responds and we are seeing that with growth in the private sector unlike we have seen in years. From businesses voluntarily paying bonuses and raising wages, to the repatriation of investments back into our economy (Apple). This was not initiated by anyone in Congress and I would speculate that had Clinton won the election, none of this would be happening now even if make up of the Congress were the same as it currently is. The difference is the President.

__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

Obama and his supporters brag about saving the US from the next Great Depression. In fact the recession ended roughly 9 months after Obama took office far too soon for his stimulus pork barrel spending to take effect.

Nonetheless Obama found a way to make the recovery the worst since the Great Depression by exploding the debt and with an open hostility towards any kind of fiscal management. In addition to record welfare costs, Obama promoted stagnant economic growth as the new normal.

Free market economies are in a constant state of change thanks to capital reallocation. As we have seen with Trump's rolling back regulations and welcoming businesses, government meddling in the economy is far more likely to make things worse than help. Obama expanded government control over businesses. Trump reduced it. The difference in results tells the story.

__________________
The Democrat's strategy for the Trump Presidency is the same one used by Stalin's secret police chief "show me the man and I will show you the crime."

We are both right.
The tax reform and repatriation of monies/investment are and will continue to better our economy. And yes, it was driven by President Trump. Congress did have to act on it. If he was dealing with a democrat controlled congress we probably wouldn't be seeing the positive activity and results.

Yes he did. I think he truly believed that 1.5-2% GDP growth was all that was left in the USA. Kind of a defeatist attitude in my opinion. We never did see President Obama's education record. I'm guessing he didn't have much education in economics. President Trump has a degree in economics.

You mean to tell me a community organizer didn't produce a good economy?

Who woulda thought?!?!?!

__________________

Check your facts...
For the entire year?
No.

Gross domestic product (GDP), the total value of goods and services produced in the U.S., never rose 3 percent annually under Obama, although there were eight separate quarters where GDP grew by more than 3 percent.

http://checkyourfact.com/2017/08/31/...3-under-obama/

So what's Trump's growth for his first year?
Hint: Not 3%.

__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln

__________________

I DID say "ONE YEAR"...I made zero claims about quarters...

1st quarter 2017 - 0.7%
2nd quarter 2017 - 3.0%
3rd quarter 2017 - 3.2%
4th quarter 2017 - 3.98% expected; Numbers not in yet.

__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd

Market has been hitting all time highs for several years now. I'm glad the partisan right wing is finally taking notice, even if it because they think they can take credit.

Funny how Yall stooped claiming the unemployment numbers were fake once your guy was in charge tho.

And as I pointed out in another thread, the reasons for the growth in the stock market differ greatly between now and during Obama's admin. The gains now are due to consumer confidence and the rolling back of regulations and taxes that attached an anchor to businesses in this country.

During the Obama admin, the stock market rise was due mainly to Quantitative Easing (QE and QE2) where the Federal Reserve simply printed money and injected it into the market (bought up stock to keep companies afloat).

The funny thing is, the Democrats scream and cry the the Republicans are in the pockets of big business but it was the Democrats that implemented the policy that printed money and handed it to Wall Street. The Republicans are rolling back regulations and cutting taxes on EVERYONE and allowing the economy to grow on it's own. Who is in who's pocket here?

__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine