![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Donate | PW Store | PW Trivia | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
The Constitution & The Judicial Branch Discuss Could the supreme court essentially nullify parts of the civil rights act of 1964? at the Political Forums; Do you suppose the supreme court could rule in favor of businesses being able to operate how they wish, and ... |
![]() |
|
Share | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Unlike Roe V. Wade, which overturned a previous court decision, Civil Rights' Law is exactly that...LAW...Which means it was created through actual legislation that was signed, sealed, and delivered... ![]()
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd |
|
||||
![]() I don't know about that, but I do believe that if Same-Sex marriage were to make its way to the court, it could be overturned and returned to the states just as abortion has been. I don't think it is quite as clear-cut as abortion, but it is another ruling that could be construed as being incorrectly decided.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington |
|
||||
![]() The SCOTUS cannot make law. Their power and function is to interpret legislated laws and the application of them. With several exceptions, notably Chief justice Roberts change Obamacare to a tax, the court has refrained from converting "law" to meet the desires of politicians or the general public.
They also cannot "invent" rights and laws which is what they did with Dread Scott, Separate but Equal, and most recently the right to abortion on demand. Intense review by later justices is how such travesties and oversights are corrected. A messy, cumbersome process however it tends to maintain uniformity.
__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's. sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura. I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE |
The Following User Says Thank You to FrancSevin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
|
||||
![]() Seems to me, That at this point at least, The court is leaning toward rights clearly described in the constitution.
So i doubt laws concerning Equal treatment for all citizens regardless of race religion etc would be in danger. While affirmative actions laws might be vulnerable. But here's my take on the situation No matter what there's no perfect system. IMO if the SCOTUS limits itself AND the legislators closer to the constitutional limits that would be great. By default a lot of issues would go back to the states. AS it was originally intended. Left and love and hate the idea based on whose ox is being gored. Stated are making & enforcing their own lawd concerning marijuana. And ignoring federal laws to the point of not cooperating with FBI and federal courts. The left happy with that. And they are happy with the same kind of actions concerning illegal immigrants. "sanctuary states". The right is happy with abortion going back to the states. And with States like Florida ignoring federal " recommendations" concerning covid. Bottom line the States are supposed to be different and the Federal govt strictly limited to a range of items explicitly listed in the constitution.
__________________
. "It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents." ..James Madison . "Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God." ..1 Peter 2:16 |
|
||||
![]() Sorry about my typos this thing "helps" me write. And I'm often distracted for too long to make corrections before the editing time limit is up.
Above "left & right" not "left & love" States not Stated Laws not lawd Etc
__________________
. "It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents." ..James Madison . "Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God." ..1 Peter 2:16 |
The Following User Says Thank You to mr wonder For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
![]() Yes, I agree, the federal government isn't supposed to get involved in things that the states could take care of.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Kizzume For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
1964, act, civil, could, court, essentially, nullify, parts, rights, supreme, the |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|