![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Donate | PW Store | PW Trivia | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
The Constitution & The Judicial Branch Discuss Biden's upcoming SCOTUS nomination at the Political Forums; Originally Posted by pjohns What does this have to do with the "delay" of a nomination, anyway? The poster is ... |
![]() |
|
Share | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GetAClue For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
After all, he said that he dos not view Robert Bork as having been fit for the job.
__________________
"In his second inaugural address, [Franklin D.] Roosevelt sought 'unimagined power' to enforce the 'proper subordination' of private power to public power. He got it…"—George Will, July 8, 2007 |
The Following User Says Thank You to pjohns For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
![]() They upheld the Constitution that the left finds to be an impediment to their ambitions. To the left, anything that stands in their way to their Socialist Utopia is to be attacked.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington |
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But I suppose that if one detests another person enough--because of his judicial philosophy, in this case--the presumption of innocence goes out the window, and is replaced by a presumption of guilt...
__________________
"In his second inaugural address, [Franklin D.] Roosevelt sought 'unimagined power' to enforce the 'proper subordination' of private power to public power. He got it…"—George Will, July 8, 2007 |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pjohns For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
![]() I recently saw a prediction online--it may have been tongue-in-cheek; but it is probably realistic--that the left will soon claim that the Constitution is...well, unconstitutional--since it was written exclusively by white men, and this country was founded upon the institution of slavery...
__________________
"In his second inaugural address, [Franklin D.] Roosevelt sought 'unimagined power' to enforce the 'proper subordination' of private power to public power. He got it…"—George Will, July 8, 2007 |
|
||||
![]() Quote:
DISCLAIIMER--for all you snowflakes out there, Manitou wishes to remind you that all judges are black-robed baboons to him. So don't tear your hair, your clothes, gnash your teeth, or fart at the moon over my title for them. |
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
|
||||
![]() Quote:
How was he not qualified? ![]()
__________________
The leading cause of death among U.S. police officers in 2021 was covid-19 https://nleomf.org/wp-content/upload...-Final-web.pdf |
|
||||
![]() Quote:
yes as a woman in the workplace I believed her. she had no reason to lie and put herself at the mercy of mostly male questioners. the things Thomas did to harass her were also standard creep ploys.
__________________
The leading cause of death among U.S. police officers in 2021 was covid-19 https://nleomf.org/wp-content/upload...-Final-web.pdf |
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The exchanges here in this thread are illuminating; they expose either an inability to maintain continuity of thought or a complete lack of intellectual integrity (or both). To criticize someone for a defect in character or reasoning, and then turn immediately and do what you were decrying, takes a special kind of mindset: . ???? My answer that Robert Bork was unsuitable for SCOTUS, does, as @pjohns points out, absolutely eliminate the conclusion her attack is grounded in. If I did blindly support anyone who is aligned with my orginalist / textualist judicial doctrine, (or just my conservative "policy views"), how could I possibly say Bork was unqualified? She proves in that last post of puzzlement, she recognizes the incongruity of her assessment of me but just pushes on, doing her usual shifted challenge, asking for an answer she has no interest in hearing or understanding. The " ![]() The ignorant arrogance is so boring. She desperately wants to challenge my positions and statements but she has no real knowledge of what's being discussed. She can't engage in actual debate, all she can express is her disdain and disgust that someone has the audacity to disagree with her. That personal sense of affront is evident in that goofy post #27 . . . She complains about my "insults" that somehow include "Oprah"(?????) and my "presumptive privilege". Never is there any actual defense of her statements / positions o my challenges; her argument is just claiming hurt feelings. .
__________________
You can’t truly call yourself “peaceful” unless you are capable of great violence.
If you are incapable of violence, you are not peaceful, you are just harmless. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeerleader For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
biden, nomination, scotus, upcoming |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|