Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > The Constitution & The Judicial Branch
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Constitution & The Judicial Branch Discuss Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal imm at the Political Forums; The Wise Latina Justice Sotomayor is upset over the SCOTUS deciding Democrat favoring district judges ought not issue nationwide injunctions ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2020, 08:40 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 18,633
Thanks: 12,067
Thanked 12,966 Times in 7,590 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal imm

The Wise Latina Justice Sotomayor is upset over the SCOTUS deciding Democrat favoring district judges ought not issue nationwide injunctions based on a partisan animus against the Trump administration.

Quote:
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a scathing dissent late Friday night, castigating the government for repeatedly asking the Supreme Court on an emergency basis to allow controversial policies to go into effect and charging her conservative colleagues on the court with being too eager to side with the Trump administration on such requests.

The justice wrote that granting emergency applications often upends "the normal appellate process" while "putting a thumb on the scale in favor of the party that won." Targeting her conservative colleagues, she said "most troublingly, the Court's recent behavior" has benefited "one litigant over all others."
As befits a national board member of "the race" is upset at the Trump administration implementing a policy making it more difficult for public charge, welfare recipients, to obtain permanent status. After all it's the job of the imperial judiciary to block policies of the duly elected President when they conflict with her political positions. District judges ought to be able to tie up the Trump administration for years in the appeals courts.

In Sotomayor's version of justice Democrats have unlimited opportunity to petition forum shopped district judges to issue self righteous nationwide injunctions but the Trump administration's appeals ought to be rejected because they are numerous. Hurray for the apolitical justice.

https://amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.o...t%2Findex.html
__________________
What is a 30 something year old single man with a rock in one hand and a Honduran flag in the other?

An asylum seeker.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post:
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2020, 10:04 AM
Dog Man's Avatar
Down Boy!
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Nevada
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,350
Thanks: 6,907
Thanked 6,782 Times in 4,600 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger View Post
The Wise Latina Justice Sotomayor is upset over the SCOTUS deciding Democrat favoring district judges ought not issue nationwide injunctions based on a partisan animus against the Trump administration.



As befits a national board member of "the race" is upset at the Trump administration implementing a policy making it more difficult for public charge, welfare recipients, to obtain permanent status. After all it's the job of the imperial judiciary to block policies of the duly elected President when they conflict with her political positions. District judges ought to be able to tie up the Trump administration for years in the appeals courts.

In Sotomayor's version of justice Democrats have unlimited opportunity to petition forum shopped district judges to issue self righteous nationwide injunctions but the Trump administration's appeals ought to be rejected because they are numerous. Hurray for the apolitical justice.

https://amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.o...t%2Findex.html
She should be addressing the bolded part, and tell us why it's ok for judges to usurp federal laws, and make up their own laws as they go.
__________________
Appeasement, is feeding the crocodiles, hoping they will eat you last.
Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dog Man For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2020, 10:58 AM
RightofCenterLeftofCrazy
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Idaho
Gender: Male
Posts: 942
Thanks: 60
Thanked 784 Times in 442 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

I've been looking for the text of her dissent and for some reason can't seem to find it. I wonder why that is.

What I want to know is if she had any other reason for her dissent. Or was it simply that they are getting "too many appeals" from the president.

I would say she has a point if he was losing them. But as that he's not, maybe she should focus on why the court got the ruling on the specific issue wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zenock For This Useful Post:
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2020, 11:09 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,359
Thanks: 8,998
Thanked 6,484 Times in 3,713 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Why is she not enraged that liberals are trying to use the courts to change policy instead of winning at the ballot box the way the Constitution was designed? Perhaps she understands that Americans in general, to not approve of the policies of the far left.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GetAClue For This Useful Post:
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2020, 11:21 PM
Jeerleader's Avatar
Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Upper Bucks County, PA
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,366
Thanks: 1,221
Thanked 1,977 Times in 903 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenock View Post
I've been looking for the text of her dissent and for some reason can't seem to find it. I wonder why that is.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...9a905_7m48.pdf

Ted Cruz had the perfect assessment of Sotomayor's latest Trump-hating leftist open-borders crocodile tears . . .

He said about her dissent, "I read it a little bit like an arsonist complaining about the noise from the fire trucks, . . . "
__________________
You can’t truly call yourself “peaceful” unless you are capable of great violence.
If you are incapable of violence, you are not peaceful, you are just harmless.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jeerleader For This Useful Post:
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2020, 11:45 PM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 55,828
Thanks: 2,296
Thanked 36,533 Times in 20,770 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by GetAClue View Post
Why is she not enraged that liberals are trying to use the courts to change policy instead of winning at the ballot box the way the Constitution was designed?
Because that's the way the Left WANTS it...

Anyone who believes the Constitution "evolves" is immediately disqualified IMO...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cnredd For This Useful Post:
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2020, 06:16 AM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,359
Thanks: 8,998
Thanked 6,484 Times in 3,713 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd View Post
Because that's the way the Left WANTS it...

Anyone who believes the Constitution "evolves" is immediately disqualified IMO...
Yes, it was a rhetorical question. We all know why they operate in this fashion. I would just like someone on the left to address this question honestly. I won't hold my breath.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2020, 12:37 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 83,301
Thanks: 56,009
Thanked 26,471 Times in 18,964 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger View Post
The Wise Latina Justice Sotomayor is upset over the SCOTUS deciding Democrat favoring district judges ought not issue nationwide injunctions based on a partisan animus against the Trump administration.



As befits a national board member of "the race" is upset at the Trump administration implementing a policy making it more difficult for public charge, welfare recipients, to obtain permanent status. After all it's the job of the imperial judiciary to block policies of the duly elected President when they conflict with her political positions. District judges ought to be able to tie up the Trump administration for years in the appeals courts.

In Sotomayor's version of justice Democrats have unlimited opportunity to petition forum shopped district judges to issue self righteous nationwide injunctions but the Trump administration's appeals ought to be rejected because they are numerous. Hurray for the apolitical justice.

https://amp-cnn-com.cdn.ampproject.o...t%2Findex.html
I don't understand the bold

I heard she was wroth but didn't know why till now.
As I understand it the court has a calendar but the administration seems to seek special preference over frequently?
__________________
Khartoum has been facing heavy pressure and “blackmail” from the US administration to normalize relations with Israel in return for removing Sudan from the list of state sponsors of terrorism...~Jerusalem Post
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2020, 12:49 PM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 55,828
Thanks: 2,296
Thanked 36,533 Times in 20,770 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
As befits a national board member of "the race" is upset at the Trump administration...
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
I don't understand the bold
Sotomayer was a member of the racist, activist group, "La Raza", which actually means "The Race"...

Sotomayor a former member of La Raza

Quote:
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor was a member of the National Council of La Raza for six years, according to her Senate questionaire released Wednesday.

Sotomayor, who would be the first Latina Supreme Court justice, was a member of the group form 1998 to 2004.

From the questionnaire:
National Council of La Raza 1998 - 2004
Member
The Council works to improve opportunities for Hispanic Americans in five key areas: assets and investments, civil rights and immigration, education, employment and economic status, and health.
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cnredd For This Useful Post:
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2020, 01:16 PM
GottaGo's Avatar
Sanity is overrated.
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Miles to go before I sleep
Posts: 13,257
Thanks: 11,460
Thanked 9,553 Times in 5,887 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Sotomayor cannot seem to put aside her race, in order to act in the best interests of the country. While everybody has a political lean, she lets it affect her actions as an SCJ, and that is wrong, wrong, wrong.
__________________
Your life is the sum total of the choices you make.
If you don't laugh at yourself, a whole bunch of people will volunteer to do it for you
I never lose. I either win, or I learn....
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GottaGo For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
could, court, dissent, imm, issues, legal, order, reshape, scathing, sotomayor, supreme, that

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0