Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > The Constitution & The Judicial Branch
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Constitution & The Judicial Branch Discuss Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal imm at the Political Forums; Originally Posted by GottaGo Sotomayor cannot seem to put aside her race, in order to act in the best interests ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2020, 01:41 PM
GetAClue's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,221
Thanks: 8,790
Thanked 6,314 Times in 3,616 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaGo View Post
Sotomayor cannot seem to put aside her race, in order to act in the best interests of the country. While everybody has a political lean, she lets it affect her actions as an SCJ, and that is wrong, wrong, wrong.
Exactly. That tends to be the trend with left leaning judges. They allow their beliefs to subvert their Constitutional duty.
__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

A lie doesn't become truth, a wrong doesn't become right, and Evil doesn't become good, just because it is accepted by the majority. - Booker T Washington
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GetAClue For This Useful Post:
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2020, 02:53 PM
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 83,061
Thanks: 55,964
Thanked 26,451 Times in 18,951 Posts
Send a message via AIM to saltwn Send a message via MSN to saltwn Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by GottaGo View Post
Sotomayor cannot seem to put aside her race, in order to act in the best interests of the country. While everybody has a political lean, she lets it affect her actions as an SCJ, and that is wrong, wrong, wrong.
What SCJ actions has it affected?
__________________
...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2020, 08:10 AM
GottaGo's Avatar
Sanity is overrated.
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Miles to go before I sleep
Posts: 13,232
Thanks: 11,418
Thanked 9,524 Times in 5,873 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
What SCJ actions has it affected?
Did you read her opinion?

I know it's difficult to follow the premise of a thread, but go click on page 1, and read her opinion.
__________________
Your life is the sum total of the choices you make.
If you don't laugh at yourself, a whole bunch of people will volunteer to do it for you
I never lose. I either win, or I learn....
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2020, 09:00 AM
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,532
Thanks: 10,226
Thanked 8,402 Times in 4,984 Posts
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by GetAClue View Post
Why is she not enraged that liberals are trying to use the courts to change policy instead of winning at the ballot box the way the Constitution was designed? Perhaps she understands that Americans in general, to not approve of the policies of the far left.
SCOTUS itself is trying to use the courts to change policy.

There were three separate branches created for a reason.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2020, 10:38 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 18,555
Thanks: 11,972
Thanked 12,848 Times in 7,529 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Sotomayor issues scathing dissent in Supreme Court order that could reshape legal

Racist Sotomayor has a two pronged objection to the SCOTUS majority opinion. At issue is the Trump administration's new rule setting objective requirements for determining "public charge" in applicants for legal resident status renewal. The rules establish a points system for welfare usage in the last 3 years before the renewal application. Too many points classifies the applicant as a public charge ineligible for status renewal. Sotomayor's second objection is to Republicans reacting to partisan Federal district judges imposing their political beliefs to block the Trump administration frequently with nationwide injunctions. Republicans have responded to the use of Federal district courts as a political weapon by appealing directly to the SCOTUS for injunctive relief instead of allowing the injunctions to stand unchallenged while pursuing appellate hearings.

Thanks to Ted Kennedy the legal immigration system has been "reformed" to favor poor, unskilled Latin American immigrants more likely to become welfare dependent public charges. Keep in mind the renewal period is 10 years while the points system only focuses on 3 years. Nonetheless Sotomayor backs immigration by Hispanics no matter if they become welfare dependent.
__________________
What is a 30 something year old single man with a rock in one hand and a Honduran flag in the other?

An asylum seeker.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
could, court, dissent, imm, issues, legal, order, reshape, scathing, sotomayor, supreme, that

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0