Oh yeah, super agent Strzok had a pizza party where they made a cursory review of less than 1% of the emails found on Weiners laptop. But that was enough for Comey to exonerate Hillary's BFF with a lie to Congress falsely claiming FBI technology allowed them to review the documents virtually overnight. As bad as the review lie was Comey excuse exonerating Hillary's pal on the pretext that the documents had already been turned over. Never mind that classified documents had been made available to Anthony Weiner a prime candidate for blackmail.

__________________
The Democrat's strategy for the Trump Presidency is the same one used by Stalin's secret police chief "show me the man and I will show you the crime."

Kavanaugh has written over 300 judicial opinions but the focus is on memos during the Bush administration and previous confirmation hearings. Oh wait, opposing him based on his judicial record makes no sense even for Democrats.

__________________
The Democrat's strategy for the Trump Presidency is the same one used by Stalin's secret police chief "show me the man and I will show you the crime."

As most of us already know, but some are unwilling to admit, this has nothing to do with Kavanaugh, but everything to do with opposing any and everything that Trump does. Kavanaugh could be shown to be the Son of God and the Dems would still oppose him.

Wait, of course the would. Let me rephrase that, he could be the Son of Allah himself, but the Dems would still oppose him.

__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

Of course they would. According to Dems, the "Son of God" was president just two years ago...

__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd

I've always believed the most likely backup for Hillary's illegal private/government server was either Weiner's computer or another in the Uma/Weiner control. Nothing else makes sense.

Why don't the Democrats use that same FBI technology to review the Kavanaugh documents?

Overnite review. Vote. Done.

It doesn't matter. They could have given the Dems every document that was ever produced by anyone that Kavanaugh ever spoke to or had ever heard of him, given them months to review and they will would have complained. It just shows that they are not interested in anything but disrupting and delaying the process out of hatred of the man that had the audacity to defeat H. Clinton.

__________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead - Thomas Paine

Consider Elana Kagan's confirmation . . . She was Associate White House Counsel for BJ Clinton and worked on Whitewater, the travel office scandal and the Paula Jones lawsuit and payoff.

After a stint at Harvard she became Obama's Solicitor General (having never argued a case in any court).

Can you imaging the document demands if the Republicans treated her the same as the Democrats treated Kavanagh?

Today's dem's have no class, no honor, no self-respect.

__________________

They had plenty of time to review It was known at least since June Trump might pick Kavanaugh to replace Kennedy,maybe even earlier. So the idea that they don't have plenty of time to review Kavanaugh is laughable.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.b58d084dab7d








I applaud the democrats for their stall tactics,they are doing right by their voters even though its most likely futile. No one votes for a democrat politician hoping that they give republicans everything they want and no one votes for a republican politician hoping they give democrats everything they want. I just hope that when the republicans are in the minority they do the same thing when a democrat president wants to confirm a liberal justice. Democrats should be careful about doing **** that benefits their side.Like the Biden rule that later came back and bit them in the ass when it came to Obama trying to appoint a justice during the last part of his term. Or the Nuclear Option that Harry Reid did so that Obama needed only a simply majority to confirm judges that came back and bit democrats in the ass that allowed Trump to only have a simple majority to confirm judges.




.

__________________
"There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”—Theodore Roosevelt

Grassley is ultimately responsible for what he's complaining about. He did not provide all the records and Kavanaugh's written documents as a government employee - judge and lawyer.

The issues facing the Supreme Court on Roe, on Guns, on civil rights, gerrymandering, Miranda, etc. are critical issues for both sides of the aisle. Grassley and Trump are emphatic that the appointment needs to be made before the next election, and yet the SC remained one short for the past two years.

Misfeasance has led to malfeasance on the part of the Judiciary Committee. Power tends to corrupt, and we should not allow it to become the new norm.

__________________
"When injustice become law, Resistence becomes duty"
Anonymous

IDIOT-GRAM: A phrase or sentence which lacks substance, thought or is thought provoking.

Wrong again. President Bush has the authority to withhold WH documents just as Obama did for Kagan. Unlike Kagan Judge Kavanaugh has an extensive record of judicial decisions, writing and teaching.

Of course the close minded partisan Democrat Senators already pledged to oppose Kavanaugh will grasp any straw to whine about. Resistance loyalists will reflexively blame Republicans for their own childish demands why proclaiming themselves "Spartacus".

__________________
The Democrat's strategy for the Trump Presidency is the same one used by Stalin's secret police chief "show me the man and I will show you the crime."