Originally Posted by saltwn
we regulate freedom of speech and have regulated freedom to bear arms.
deal with it and quit believing the ass hats know more than everyone else
I do not have any problem with regulation of arms that falls in line with the reglation of speech . . .
Just as inciteful speech is restricted, brandishing and threatening with a firearm is forbidden. Criminalizing the actions of using speech and press to injure such as libel and slander are fine as are laws that criminalize criminal misuse of firearms, including shooting at someone without cause and injuring or killing them.
The regulation you endorse for the RKBA does not follow the exemplary restrictions on speech, and it is (as usual) disingenuous for you to hold them up as justifying examples.
To draw a legitimate equivalency, you would need to advocate gagging people before they enter a theater and making people get permits and licenses to express their sentiments -- with some locations being declared as 1st Amendment free zones where nobody but government agents shall offer opinions or disseminate writings.