Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > The Constitution & The Judicial Branch
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Constitution & The Judicial Branch Discuss Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS! at the Political Forums; Originally Posted by 300 H and H Ridiculous would be any gun owner who would let ANY Democrat have ANYTHING ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 07:35 AM
winston53660's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,045
Thanks: 1,810
Thanked 4,172 Times in 3,120 Posts
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 300 H and H View Post
Ridiculous would be any gun owner who would let ANY Democrat have ANYTHING to do with any more gun laws. Stupid are they, as this would galvanise the country against them more that they already have.

No matter who is POTUS there will be no cooperation, nothing done for the good of all, and a country divided that will fall.

Then we blame the Democrats.

Regards, Kirk
"Do you favor or oppose a law to ban the sale of assault weapons and semi-automatic rifles?"

51% favor

46% oppose

Guns
__________________
Originally Posted by TiredRetired View Post
Damn shame it couldn't have been a father / son event. IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 08:33 AM
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,234
Thanks: 7,039
Thanked 5,725 Times in 3,519 Posts
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by winston53660 View Post
"Do you favor or oppose a law to ban the sale of assault weapons and semi-automatic rifles?"

51% favor

46% oppose

Guns
Another couple of questions that should have been asked.

Do you actually know what an assault weapon or a semi-automatic weapon is?

Can you explain the 2nd amendment in 27 words or less?

Question for Winston. Are you aware that most contemporary weapons sold are semi'automatic?

The politicians who support these gun bans and their followers have no idea what they are talking about. Some recent examples of statements made in political hearings:

30 round clips are not refillable. Therefore all we need to do is stop new sales and the problem will quickly go away.

A "ghost gun" is a gun that uses a .30 caliber clip magazine and can empty said clip/magazine in half a second.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jimbo For This Useful Post:
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 09:00 AM
Conservative Sage
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 14,539
Thanks: 7,275
Thanked 8,129 Times in 5,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

In her lone case argued before the SCOTUS Elena Kagan argued the Federal government had the authority to censor election pamplets, she lost 8-0 but that didn't stop Obama from nominating her nor did it prevent Senate Democrats from confirming her nomination to the SCOTUS bench. But the real problem is the prospect of Trump appointing judge's who would look to the Constitution.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 09:54 AM
Jeerleader's Avatar
Guide
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Upper Bucks County, PA
Gender: Male
Posts: 339
Thanks: 184
Thanked 381 Times in 201 Posts
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
we certainly need more liberal judges . . . to correct this ridiculous thought that any and all guns for everyone w/o exceptions has gotten a hook in our society
You need a "liberal judge" to correct your ridiculous delusion that "all guns for everyone w/o exceptions" is the desired state of law for gun rights advocates (or worse, that it is the current state of law)?

That you histrionic liberals can't honestly state what your opposition's position is, or even state what current law is, tells thinking people everywhere that liberals should never be given any power to state what the law is for anyone.

Yours is a world of fantasy and misrepresentation and self-deception where your imagination and child-like fears and insecurities rule your understanding and thus your beliefs.

.
__________________
Allowing an illegal border crosser to stay in the US with amnesty and start the legal immigration process
is like allowing a bank robber to go free and keep the money as long as he fills out a loan application.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeerleader For This Useful Post:
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 02:51 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 71,168
Thanks: 51,952
Thanked 24,692 Times in 17,460 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeerleader View Post
You need a "liberal judge" to correct your ridiculous delusion that "all guns for everyone w/o exceptions" is the desired state of law for gun rights advocates (or worse, that it is the current state of law)?

That you histrionic liberals can't honestly state what your opposition's position is, or even state what current law is, tells thinking people everywhere that liberals should never be given any power to state what the law is for anyone.

Yours is a world of fantasy and misrepresentation and self-deception where your imagination and child-like fears and insecurities rule your understanding and thus your beliefs.

.
Adult discernment. We have a perfect and legal right to regulate guns.
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 02:56 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 71,168
Thanks: 51,952
Thanked 24,692 Times in 17,460 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 300 H and H View Post
Ridiculous would be any gun owner who would let ANY Democrat have ANYTHING to do with any more gun laws. Stupid are they, as this would galvanise the country against them more that they already have.

No matter who is POTUS there will be no cooperation, nothing done for the good of all, and a country divided that will fall.

Then we blame the Democrats.

Regards, Kirk
7 Reasons the UN Gun Ban Won't Be Taking Away Your Guns
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 06:11 PM
ShivaTD's Avatar
Progressive Libertarian
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Immigrant to Arizona
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,833
Thanks: 1,417
Thanked 2,056 Times in 1,620 Posts
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

As a nation we're truly blessed that Donald Trump will never be elected president and after November the Democrats are going to control the Senate.
__________________
“No Tribe has a right to sell, even to each other, much less strangers.... a country. Sell a country! Why not sell the air, the great sea, as well as the earth? Didn't the Great Spirit make them all for the use of his children?" Tecumseh Shawnee
The Native Americans understood the Natural Right "Of Property" that John Locke attempted to explain. No person can own the land, the air, or the water because they belong to all people. We can only use the land, the air, and the water.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ShivaTD For This Useful Post:
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 06:33 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 71,168
Thanks: 51,952
Thanked 24,692 Times in 17,460 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShivaTD View Post
As a nation we're truly blessed that Donald Trump will never be elected president and after November the Democrats are going to control the Senate.
hopefully
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 06:35 PM
Jeerleader's Avatar
Guide
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Upper Bucks County, PA
Gender: Male
Posts: 339
Thanks: 184
Thanked 381 Times in 201 Posts
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
Adult discernment. We have a perfect and legal right to regulate guns.
And you can't even use the terminology correctly.

Governments only possess powers --powers that have been expressly granted to it to preform specific duties assigned to it-- not rights that exist inherently as an aspect of its existence.

Saying a right exists is noting that no express grant of power to impact that interest can be said to exist . . . A right is an exception of powers not granted, not the default condition of government looming over and dictating to the citizen.

The federal powers that you claim exist over the private citizen and his personal arms have been conjured into being by over-reading the commerce clause.

You can not point to a single syllable of the Constitution that grants the federal government any power to have any interest whatsoever, in the personal arms of the private citizen.
__________________
Allowing an illegal border crosser to stay in the US with amnesty and start the legal immigration process
is like allowing a bank robber to go free and keep the money as long as he fills out a loan application.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2016, 07:34 PM
saltwn's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Esto perpetua
Posts: 71,168
Thanks: 51,952
Thanked 24,692 Times in 17,460 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Trump would appoint radical R wing Judges to SCOTUS!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeerleader View Post
And you can't even use the terminology correctly.

Governments only possess powers --powers that have been expressly granted to it to preform specific duties assigned to it-- not rights that exist inherently as an aspect of its existence.

Saying a right exists is noting that no express grant of power to impact that interest can be said to exist . . . A right is an exception of powers not granted, not the default condition of government looming over and dictating to the citizen.

The federal powers that you claim exist over the private citizen and his personal arms have been conjured into being by over-reading the commerce clause.

You can not point to a single syllable of the Constitution that grants the federal government any power to have any interest whatsoever, in the personal arms of the private citizen.
we regulate freedom of speech and have regulated freedom to bear arms.
deal with it and quit believing the ass hats know more than everyone else
they don't
__________________
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
appoint, judges, radical, scotus, trump, wing, would

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0