![]() |
|
Register | FAQ | Donate | PW Store | PW Trivia | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
The Constitution & The Judicial Branch Discuss Withheld Fast and Furious Papers to be indexed at the Political Forums; Originally Posted by Mikeyy This thread started in July 2014. It has produced nothing but the hopes of the haters ... |
![]() |
|
Share | LinkBack (2) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
![]() On Jan 28th, 5 days before the deadline, Lynch asked for 60 days more time until March 21st. The Committee objected of course, but Jackson went ahead and suspended the Feb 2 deadline. Jackson stated that although she doesn't believe Lynch needs more time, because the original ruling was Aug of 2014, she is bound by appellate rules.
April 8, 2016 is now the new deadline to produce documents related to the Oct. 11, 2011 subpoena. She also states that "this is a FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER." Final and appealable certainly seem contradictory so if I'm reading this right, the document concealment will go on because Lynch will continue the legacy of her predecessor and appeal. |
|
||||
![]() Back in March 2013, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA for documents related to an ordered mediation between Congress and the DOJ and of course they were denied. JW sued and was denied by district court Judge, then appealed to a 3 judge panel who vacated that decision and sent the case to Judge Jackson so she could clarify a statement she made. Her clarification will be sent back to the 3 judge panel in order rule on a handful of documents related to a failed mediation.
Why such secrecy? http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...us-docs-secret |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to zoriolus For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
![]() More left wing bull sh1t to keep us from the truth...
Liars the left are, from Obama, Hillary and on down the ladder. Stonewalling liars, all of them. ![]() Can't wait to end the sh1t the left wing has pulled on the rest of us. This is just one little piece.... Regards, Kirk |
The Following User Says Thank You to 300 H and H For This Useful Post: | ||
|
||||
![]() Great posting of the facts zoriolus , please keep up the great work.
![]() And 300 H and H man I agree 100% with what you last said.. ![]() Even a simple Liberal has to lie or lose face daily. They lie while looking into any mirror or item that reflects back their image, so they can do it in public. ![]()
__________________
![]() _ ... _ Improvise - Adapt - Over Come ... _ ... ![]() |
|
|||
![]() From your story by the RW writer Julian Hattem
"A federal appeals court on Friday overturned a lower court ruling that kept a lid on a handful of documents related to a lawsuit from Congress over the Obama administration’s botched “Fast and Furious” operation." That is the first line of the story. This wasn't a Obama administrations operation. I have not seen a shred of evidence that Obama knew a thing about it. And nobody else has either. Quote:
|
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It explains what the documents are and what they are not. Are documents about the release of documents to be sealed from public view based on executive privilege which, by the way, she ruled didn't apply? We are in this legal labyrinth or as Frank7 called it, a "snake ball". |
|
||||
![]() ![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() _ ... _ Improvise - Adapt - Over Come ... _ ... ![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
and, fast, furious, indexed, papers, withheld |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/constitution-judicial-branch/39658-withheld-fast-furious-papers-indexed.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
Fast and furious - Who is talking about Fast and furious on FORUM | This thread | Refback | 01-28-2015 12:17 PM | |
Belatedly Released and Revealing Fast & Furious Docs | Sharyl Attkisson | This thread | Refback | 12-28-2014 10:32 AM |