Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder
I have to say I'm not sure WHAT exactly the Pope means by it.
the Idea of Natures balance is a pretty squishy term. there's no real hard scientific boundary for it.
Ok that's ONE way to think of it I guess. and to start it seems Rocks and Stars aren't part of "nature" here, just living things so OK. But the terms still aren't quite clear. what in nature are you expecting or hoping survives? Microbes? Man? everything that's alive NOW?
you say "Not necessarily in the same form", you say it can "change" .. OK but by how much? 20% extinctions of major animal forms? 50% 90%? Just Humans gone? Change is retaliative. and roaches, bacteria and plants might do quite well without many larger animal types. Should we consider "Nature in balance" in a world like that?
Seems to me it depends on our definition.
See i'd word it a bit differently , that that particular natural environment might not survive. But "Nature" hasn't died or loss balance. It's doing what you said earlier... adapting to change. the various parts of Nature doing what they do.
Agreed and thanks!
Mutation from pressures from the environment and it's own built in mutative limits (mutations tend to break down (kill) the whole organism/virus if to many are made).
Mutations made by MAN not "nature" is the other option.
the Pope, CLimate Change zealots, and Nature lovers who tend of over personify it.
|
Nutshell version: A plant prefers a specific environment to grow and flourish. Lets say it prefers moist soil and shade.
Version 1. Someone comes along, and cuts down the tree that provides the shade. Now it is in full sun, and the soil dries out because of it. Chances are, the plant will die.
Version 2. Someone comes along and trims the branches of the tree providing shade, so now the plant gets more sun than it prefers. It may not perform as well, but since the soil still retains some moisture, it will likely survive. It may mutate over years to acclimate to the changes, but survival is likely.
For the books, I am very much a plant hugger, but not a militant tree hugger. Call me light green if you will.
