Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > General Discussion > Climate Change & The Environment
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Climate Change & The Environment Discuss Study: Environmentalists Have ‘Substantially Worse than Average’ Carbon Footprints at the General Discussion; Originally Posted by rivrrat That's an article that speaks directly the types of trees that offset carbon best, not the ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2014, 02:00 AM
40yearfan's Avatar
Easy Living
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,970
Thanks: 2,617
Thanked 3,963 Times in 2,718 Posts
Default Re: Study: Environmentalists Have ‘Substantially Worse than Average’ Carbon Footprint

Quote:
Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
That's an article that speaks directly the types of trees that offset carbon best, not the location of the trees.
From the article:

Quote:
Plant the Right Tree for the Right Location
Scientists are busy studying the carbon sequestration potential of different types of trees in various parts of the U.S., including Eucalyptus in Hawaii, loblolly pine in the Southeast, bottomland hardwoods in Mississippi, and poplars in the Great Lakes.

“There are literally dozens of tree species that could be planted depending upon location, climate and soils,” says Stan Wullschleger, a researcher at Tennessee’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory who specializes in the physiological response of plants to global climate change
__________________
__________________________________________
We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2014, 09:57 AM
rivrrat's Avatar
Queen of Awesomeness
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia
Gender: Female
Posts: 15,833
Thanks: 3,272
Thanked 10,473 Times in 6,022 Posts
Default Re: Study: Environmentalists Have ‘Substantially Worse than Average’ Carbon Footprint

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
From the article:
Yes, it's talking specifically about the US. Nothing more. And the types of trees that would grow best in certain locations in the US.
__________________


Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.

Gypsy Soul Memories
Scuba Diver Life
My YouTube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2014, 11:59 PM
40yearfan's Avatar
Easy Living
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,970
Thanks: 2,617
Thanked 3,963 Times in 2,718 Posts
Default Re: Study: Environmentalists Have ‘Substantially Worse than Average’ Carbon Footprint

Quote:
Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
Yes, it's talking specifically about the US. Nothing more. And the types of trees that would grow best in certain locations in the US.
I feel like we are going around in circles. I stated we should plant more trees to eat up the CO2 and you said it wouldn't help unless they were planted close to the equator. The article I put on here was written by Stan Wullschleger, a researcher at Tennessee’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory who specializes in the physiological response of plants to global climate change. He claims that planting them anywhere in the US is appropriate when you are trying to help decrease CO2. I am saying it doesn't have to be around the equator, but can be right here anywhere in the US.
__________________
__________________________________________
We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2014, 12:06 AM
rivrrat's Avatar
Queen of Awesomeness
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Virginia
Gender: Female
Posts: 15,833
Thanks: 3,272
Thanked 10,473 Times in 6,022 Posts
Default Re: Study: Environmentalists Have ‘Substantially Worse than Average’ Carbon Footprint

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40yearfan View Post
I feel like we are going around in circles. I stated we should plant more trees to eat up the CO2 and you said it wouldn't help unless they were planted close to the equator. The article I put on here was written by Stan Wullschleger, a researcher at Tennessee’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory who specializes in the physiological response of plants to global climate change. He claims that planting them anywhere in the US is appropriate when you are trying to help decrease CO2. I am saying it doesn't have to be around the equator, but can be right here anywhere in the US.
Yes, you can plant trees anywhere they can grow and they will help, minimally, with CO2. It certainly cannot hurt. But when you're talking about massive, worldwide effects - just planting them anywhere will not help on a large scale.
__________________


Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are.

Gypsy Soul Memories
Scuba Diver Life
My YouTube Channel
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 06-08-2014, 01:28 AM
40yearfan's Avatar
Easy Living
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix, AZ.
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,970
Thanks: 2,617
Thanked 3,963 Times in 2,718 Posts
Default Re: Study: Environmentalists Have ‘Substantially Worse than Average’ Carbon Footprint

Quote:
Originally Posted by rivrrat View Post
Yes, you can plant trees anywhere they can grow and they will help, minimally, with CO2. It certainly cannot hurt. But when you're talking about massive, worldwide effects - just planting them anywhere will not help on a large scale.
Quote:
Take the Pledge and Plant a Tree
The campaign encourages people and organizations around the world to enter pledges on a web site hosted by the UNEP. The campaign is open to everyone—concerned citizens, schools, community groups, nonprofit organizations, farmers, businesses, and local and national governments. A pledge can be anything from a single tree to 10 million trees.

The campaign identifies four key areas for planting: degraded natural forests and wilderness areas; farms and rural landscapes; sustainably managed plantations; and urban environments, but it can also begin with a single tree in a back yard. Advice on choosing and planting trees is available through the web site
Plant a Billion Trees - People Worldwide Pledge to Fight Global Warming

Not according to what I've been reading. It's not the place. It's the number of trees.
__________________
__________________________________________
We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
average’, carbon, environmentalists, footprints, have, study, than, worse, ‘substantially

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0