Skeptic Finds He Now Agrees Global Warming Is Real

Coyote · #1 (**permalink**) 10-31-2011, 01:34 PM

Entire article: Skeptic Finds He Now Agrees Global Warming Is Real : NPR

Quote:

WASHINGTON (AP) — A prominent physicist and skeptic of global warming spent two years trying to find out if mainstream climate scientists were wrong. In the end, he determined they were right: Temperatures really are rising rapidly.

The study of the world's surface temperatures by Richard Muller was partially bankrolled by a foundation connected to global warming deniers. He pursued long-held skeptic theories in analyzing the data. He was spurred to action because of "Climategate," a British scandal involving hacked emails of scientists.

Yet he found that the land is 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) warmer than in the 1950s. Those numbers from Muller, who works at the University of California, Berkeley, and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, match those by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA.

He said he went even further back, studying readings from Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson. His ultimate finding of a warming world, to be presented at a conference Monday, is no different from what mainstream climate scientists have been saying for decades.

What's different, and why everyone from opinion columnists to cable TV 's satirical"The Daily Show" is paying attention is who is behind the study.

One-quarter of the $600,000 to do the research came from the Charles Koch Foundation, whose founder is a major funder of skeptic groups and the conservative tea party movement. The Koch brothers, Charles and David, run a large privately held company involved in oil and other industries, producing sizable greenhouse gas emissions.

Muller's research team carefully examined two chief criticisms by skeptics. One is that weather stations are unreliable; the other is that cities, which create heat islands, were skewing the temperature analysis.

"The skeptics raised valid points and everybody should have been a skeptic two years ago," Muller said in a telephone interview. "And now we have confidence that the temperature rise that had previously been reported had been done without bias."

Muller said that he came into the study "with a proper skepticism," something scientists "should always have. I was somewhat bothered by the fact that there was not enough skepticism" before.

There is no reason now to be a skeptic about steadily increasing temperatures, Muller wrote recently in The Wall Street Journal's editorial pages, a place friendly to climate change skeptics. Muller did not address in his research the cause of global warming. The overwhelming majority of climate scientists say it's man-made from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil. Nor did his study look at ocean warming, future warming and how much of a threat to mankind climate change might be.

Still, Muller said it makes sense to reduce the carbon dioxide created by fossil fuels.

"Greenhouse gases could have a disastrous impact on the world," he said. Still, he contends that threat is not as proven as the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says it is.

On Monday, Muller was taking his results — four separate papers that are not yet published or peer-reviewed, but will be, he says — to a conference in Santa Fe, New Mexico, expected to include many prominent skeptics as well as mainstream scientists.

"Of course he'll be welcome," said Petr Chylek of Los Alamos National Lab, a noted skeptic and the conference organizer. "The purpose of our conference is to bring people with different views on climate together, so they can talk and clarify things."

Shawn Lawrence Otto, author of the book "Fool Me Twice" that criticizes science skeptics, said Muller should expect to be harshly treated by global warming deniers. "Now he's considered a traitor. For the skeptic community, this isn't about data or fact. It's about team sports. He's been traded to the Indians. He's playing for the wrong team now."

And that started on Sunday, when a British newspaper said one of Muller's co-authors, Georgia Tech climate scientist Judith Curry, accused Muller of another Climategate-like scandal and trying to "hide the decline" of recent global temperatures.

The Associated Press contacted Curry on Sunday afternoon and she said in an email that Muller and colleagues "are not hiding any data or otherwise engaging in any scientifically questionable practice."

The Muller "results unambiguously show an increase in surface temperature since 1960," Curry wrote Sunday. She said she disagreed with Muller's public relations efforts and some public comments from Muller about there no longer being a need for skepticism.

Muller's study found that skeptics' concerns about poor weather station quality didn't skew the results of his analysis because temperature increases rose similarly in reliable and unreliable weather stations. He also found that while there is an urban heat island effect making cities warmer, rural areas, which are more abundant, are warming, too.

Among many climate scientists, the reaction was somewhat of a yawn.

"After lots of work he found exactly what was already known and accepted in the climate community," said Jerry North, a Texas A&M University atmospheric sciences professor who headed a National Academy of Sciences climate science review in 2006. "I am hoping their study will have a positive impact. But some folks will never change."

Chris Field, a Carnegie Institution scientist who is chief author of an upcoming intergovernmental climate change report, said Muller's study "may help the world's citizens focus less on whether climate change is real and more on smart options for addressing it."

Some of the most noted scientific skeptics are no longer saying the world isn't warming. Instead, they question how much of it is man-made, view it as less a threat and argue it's too expensive to do something about, Otto said.

Skeptical MIT scientist Richard Lindzen said it is a fact and nothing new that global average temperatures have been rising since 1950, as Muller shows. "It's hard to see how any serious scientist (skeptical, denier or believer — frequently depending on the exact question) will view it otherwise," he wrote in an email.

In a brief email statement, the Koch Foundation noted that Muller's team didn't examine ocean temperature or the cause of warming and said it will continue to fund such research. "The project is ongoing and entering peer review, and we're proud to support this strong, transparent research," said foundation spokeswoman Tonya Mullins.

Interesting

Bodo · #2 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 07:44 AM

No one is arguing against the fact that the Earth is warming

What many have a problem is with the cause

Your article doesn't address the cause.

Notice how the skeptics allow EVERYONE to come speak while the true believers do everything they can to shut down the heretics.

GottaGo · #3 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bodo

No one is arguing against the fact that the Earth is warming

What many have a problem is with the cause

Your article doesn't address the cause.

Notice how the skeptics allow EVERYONE to come speak while the true believers do everything they can to shut down the heretics.

You forgot how it all could be fixed by taxing us for it.

Calypso Jones · #4 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 10:38 AM

you're kidding right. Do you know the background of this freak?

Coyote · #5 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bodo

No one is arguing against the fact that the Earth is warming

What many have a problem is with the cause

Your article doesn't address the cause.

Notice how the skeptics allow EVERYONE to come speak while the true believers do everything they can to shut down the heretics.

According to what?

Bodo · #6 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coyote

According to what?

According to other scientists. They claim that journals and meetings are blocking their admissions to journals and seminars.

Science works because of skeptics, not in spite of them.

cnredd · #7 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bodo

Science works because of skeptics, not in spite of them.

BINGO!!!!!!...

Infidel Dog · #8 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 03:04 PM

Muller was never a skeptic. He's BS-ing you. He was an advocate for global warming 30 years ago by his own admission.

Climategate Junior Don Surber

Muller was caught with his pants down lying in his press release by the study's co-author, and NPR is trying to run cover for him.

Here's the other side of this story.

Scientists who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague | Mail Online

rivrrat · #9 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 03:12 PM

Yes yes yes... the earth is warming.

Again.

Coyote · #10 (**permalink**) 11-01-2011, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bodo

According to other scientists. They claim that journals and meetings are blocking their admissions to journals and seminars.

Science works because of skeptics, not in spite of them.

They "claim".

What proof that their claim is valid? That admissions are refused because they don't meet established criteria for submission?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Coyote For This Useful Post:
crazyflamingos, foundit66

The Following User Says Thank You to Infidel Dog For This Useful Post:
Coyote

The Following User Says Thank You to rivrrat For This Useful Post:
Zaba