![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Donate | PW Store | PW Trivia | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Climate Change & The Environment Discuss Green Jobs Myth - An Example at the General Discussion; Originally Posted by faithful_servant Solar doesn't work because it's not consistent and the manufacturing techniques are firggin' ugly. The key ... |
![]() |
|
|
Share | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
So we're running out of rare earth elements, and they're needed for other technologies - not just green. Here's another problem with that. Quote:
Last edited by Infidel Dog; 01-31-2011 at 02:57 PM.. |
|
||||
|
Wind? You must be joking. Maybe if you could harness the hot air from wind promoters. Other than that, there's lots of evidence wind can't survive without hefty subsidies (dwarfing oil), or regulatory and tax breaks. Overall it doesn't make economic, or even environmental sense.
T Boone Pickens backed off his much publicized pie in the sky, wind energy claims. When it came time to buck up he had to admit he couldn't make money on wind. Pickens Plan no longer features wind energy - Business - Oil & energy - Going Green - msnbc.com The sometimes ballyhooed wind energy of Denmark is a job killing, shell game that skyrockets the price of electricity, and doesn't actually make money. http://www.cepos.dk/fileadmin/user_u...of_Denmark.pdf They tried to move to wind in Minnesota. Problem was the wind turbines wouldn't work in cold weather. Minnesota wind turbines won’t work in cold weather Hot Air You run into more problems with wind when you start asking where are you going to put the wind farms, and where are you going to get the money for the mind-boggling expensive, yet required new electricity grid to customers. Green.view: Mission: Transmission | The Economist There is of course an argument. I've heard it. Climate Progress's Romm Responds Unkindly to NewsBusters | NewsBusters.org If I'm judging that debate your side not only loses, it looks silly. Last edited by Infidel Dog; 01-31-2011 at 04:39 PM.. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Truth, Justice and the American way |
|
||||
|
Sure, they work. The problem is they're not economically viable on any kind of large scale. Their functionality depends on environmental cooperation, you need to build a new grid just to get the spurts they put out, and because they need to be augmented with fossil fuel energy, they may not even be that environmentally productive. At present "Green Jobs" from wind, or solar in a way they can pay for themselves are a myth. You're putting more money out than you're taking in, and it's government money. You might as well just pay welfare. Plus, as the Spanish study showed, you lose 2 real jobs for every welfare green job you create. Plus a lot of those jobs are temporary.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Our nation has not always lived up to its ideals, yet those ideals have never ceased to guide us. They expose our flaws, and lead us to mend them. We are the beneficiaries of the work of the generations before us and it is each generation's responsibility to continue that work. - Laura Bush Leftists and very small children don't seem to be able to understand that the Government isn't there to "fix" the economy, anymore than a tick is there to fix your dog.~Oftencold |
| The Following User Says Thank You to faithful_servant For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The same people were saying that seatbelts, smog control and fuel mileage would cost too much........and wouldn't work. Well..........they were wrong. ![]() It's also easy to point at any fledgling industry and say it won't work, before economy of scale kicks in. . |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The economy of scale only works on a profitable product and is incremental in it's application and benefits to the bottom line. If you sell an item for a dollar and it costs .90 to create that product then you may be able to benefit from scaling up if the demand remains proportionate. That means you may be able to double your production and decrease the cost to .85 per unit. Since materials have a specific cost of obtaining them that doesn't mean you can double your production again and save another .05. You will be lucky to drop it another .01 or .02 but the supplier will determine that possibility as they won't go in the red just to sell you a lot more stuff really cheap. Because after all the economy of scale only works if there is a profit. Now let's take that same product and say it costs 1.10 to make and sells for 1.00. You double the production and maybe your supplier saves you the same .05 so now you are losing .15 instead of .20 but you are still losing money. Economy of scale is a myth in green energy right now. You MUST have a profitable product before you can make it more profitable. You can NEVER make a loser profitable by doubling down. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
You have totally ignored fixed costs, which are just that.....fixed. As quantity increases, fixed costs stay generally the same...or are just marginally increased. The economics of putting solar on a house, do not equate to a solar field supplying vastly more power. Admittedly, Green still has along way to go....... both in scale and technology. Just look at the computer industry 20 years ago, to get a clue of the potential. If your attitude was prevalent back then, Moore would have had no basis for making his "law." You can find a little more info here. Economy Of Scale (click here) Quote:
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| example, green, jobs, myth |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|