Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > Civil Rights
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Civil Rights Discuss Anti-gay shirt fight continues at the Political Forums; Anti-gay shirt fight continues :: Bolingbrook Sun :: News Two years ago, though, Heidi Zamecnik, then a junior at Neuqua, ...

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
  1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 12:43 PM
dabateman's Avatar
Mister Freedom2Love
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,470
Thanks: 152
Thanked 651 Times in 416 Posts
Default Anti-gay shirt fight continues

Anti-gay shirt fight continues :: Bolingbrook Sun :: News

Quote:
Two years ago, though, Heidi Zamecnik, then a junior at Neuqua, decided to wear her own, homemade T-shirt expressing her sentiments on homosexuality. She wore it the day after the Day of Silence, which some call the Day of Truth. The shirt said, "My Day of Silence, Straight Alliance," on the front and "Be happy, not gay" on the back. According to the federal lawsuit Zamecnik filed against Indian Prairie District 204 board and various district and school administrators, she was told she had to remove the shirt or leave school because some students and staff found it offensive.
What are the rights of the students and are those rights trumped by the overriding need for a cohesive educational environment?
__________________
Quote:
"The public does not like you to mislead or represent yourself to be something you're not. And the other thing that the public really does like is the self-examination to say, you know, I'm not perfect. I'm just like you. They don't ask their public officials to be perfect. They just ask them to be smart, truthful, honest, and show a modicum of good sense." Ann Richards, Former Texas Governor
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 03:28 PM
cnredd's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,945
Thanks: 216
Thanked 2,157 Times in 1,610 Posts
Default Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

I think the matter here is the tone of the shirt...

Telling people not to be gay was the part that did it...

If she was shown the door for the day for just the front part, I'd be defending her like a champ...

But the addition on the back was too much...I fully understand how this disrupts the school...
__________________
"You get the respect that you give" - cnredd
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cnredd For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:38 AM
One
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Florida
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 210
Thanked 164 Times in 148 Posts
Default Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

Did the school help promote the "official day of silence"? If they did the girl had every right to protest.

I have been offended by the "taking over" of certain words and phrases by many different groups to the point where a NEW definition is added to the dictionary for them and therefore EVERYBODY has to change their USE of common ENGLISH. Many words are being TAKEN from us in order not to offend some people. I can't find anywhere the right to NOT be offended.

Gay
Lynch/Lynching
HO (mispronunciation of a word)Whore....Hoe.....Ho, ho, ho...."Wagons ho"...Horse; Whoa
Negro/Negroid
White
Nappy
Red
Green
Black
Honky(first of a 2 part phrase ending in tonk)
Queer
Tramp
Hobo
Vagabond
Bum
Homeless
Bastard
Lazy
Stupid
Spastic/Spaz
Homo
Straight
Retarded
Zealot
Christian
Evangelical
Bitch
Naggart(one who nags)
Clan(because in pronunciation it sounds like Klan)
Cult(Mormon?)
Choice(Free?)
Right(in or not in the Bill of)
Wing(left or right)
Noose
Nazi
Socialist
Communist
Regime
Democracy
Republic
Church
State
Village
Welfare
Charity
Free
Monopoly
Idiot
Plantation


Some of these are here for the opposite reason that is they are NOT allowed to be used. Many of these words have actual scientific meanings but "laypeople" took offense. Others are here because of incorrect usage. I bet you could add to this list.
__________________
"Most people can't think, most of the remainder won't think, the small fraction who do think mostly can't do it very well. The extremely tiny fraction who think regularly, accurately, creatively and without self delusion---In the long run these are the only people that count."Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 11:10 AM
tristanrobin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 427
Thanked 613 Times in 385 Posts
Default Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

I haven't received the memo that these words are banned in the United States...indeed, many are commonly used.

Now, what is acceptable in a public school and what is allowed in your personal life/space are two very very different things.

you knew that, didn't you?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 12:19 PM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,521
Thanks: 719
Thanked 1,387 Times in 890 Posts
Post Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
Did the school help promote the "official day of silence"? If they did the girl had every right to protest.
It's the WAY she protested which is at issue.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1
I have been offended by the "taking over" of certain words and phrases by many different groups to the point where a NEW definition is added to the dictionary for them and therefore EVERYBODY has to change their USE of common ENGLISH. Many words are being TAKEN from us in order not to offend some people. I can't find anywhere the right to NOT be offended.
Nor can I find how these words are "taken over".
You are free to use the words as you please in your own free speech.

The fact that others don't follow suit is not a real problem.
At best, it's your own issue of "offense" that people don't share your position.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 01:45 PM
crazyflamingos's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alabama
Gender: Female
Posts: 891
Thanks: 1,916
Thanked 370 Times in 249 Posts
Default Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
Did the school help promote the "official day of silence"? If they did the girl had every right to protest.

I have been offended by the "taking over" of certain words and phrases by many different groups to the point where a NEW definition is added to the dictionary for them and therefore EVERYBODY has to change their USE of common ENGLISH. Many words are being TAKEN from us in order not to offend some people. I can't find anywhere the right to NOT be offended.

Gay
Lynch/Lynching
HO (mispronunciation of a word)Whore....Hoe.....Ho, ho, ho...."Wagons ho"...Horse; Whoa
Negro/Negroid
White
Nappy
Red
Green
Black
Honky(first of a 2 part phrase ending in tonk)
Queer
Tramp
Hobo
Vagabond
Bum
Homeless
Bastard
Lazy
Stupid
Spastic/Spaz
Homo
Straight
Retarded
Zealot
Christian
Evangelical
Bitch
Naggart(one who nags)
Clan(because in pronunciation it sounds like Klan)
Cult(Mormon?)
Choice(Free?)
Right(in or not in the Bill of)
Wing(left or right)
Noose
Nazi
Socialist
Communist
Regime
Democracy
Republic
Church
State
Village
Welfare
Charity
Free
Monopoly
Idiot
Plantation


Some of these are here for the opposite reason that is they are NOT allowed to be used. Many of these words have actual scientific meanings but "laypeople" took offense. Others are here because of incorrect usage. I bet you could add to this list.
Language evolves from the bottom up. Words mean what the common people want them to mean.

Being offended at the evolution of the English language is about as useful as being offended that birds fly south in the winter.
__________________
Jesus Was A Liberal

If a certain course of action makes the mouth-breathers furious, then that’s a good policy. – The Practical Environmentalist
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to crazyflamingos For This Useful Post:
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 03:12 PM
Idealogically Promiscuous's Avatar
Senior member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,108
Thanks: 309
Thanked 376 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

We had this discussion about this girl a while back. The difference between the Day of Silence and what this girl did is very simple: the Day of Silence is meant to show solidarity and support for the plights of others. What this girl did was a blatant attempt at throwing a divisive wrench into what was otherwise a beneficial exercise in tolerance and understanding. Basically, she was being a little bitch about it and hiding her affront behind the free speech shield. Honestly, she shouldn't have even been given the opportunity to remove the shirt and stay; she should have been suspended for three days.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Idealogically Promiscuous For This Useful Post:
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:11 PM
One
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Central Florida
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 210
Thanked 164 Times in 148 Posts
Default Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

So I guess that there were NO SIGNS promoting the "day of silence" that was promoting the "gay agenda". She only brought her own sign. On a different day. Thus NOT interfering whatsoever. I personally believe that gayism like religion and morals should be VERY careful about its presentation to CHILDREN. In some cultures murder IS ACCEPTABLE. The problem comes from the fact that a SUB-culture insists on being mainstream and in-your-face instead of passive and unobtrusive. Sexuality is a PRIVATE thing NOT public.
__________________
"Most people can't think, most of the remainder won't think, the small fraction who do think mostly can't do it very well. The extremely tiny fraction who think regularly, accurately, creatively and without self delusion---In the long run these are the only people that count."Robert Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:29 PM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,521
Thanks: 719
Thanked 1,387 Times in 890 Posts
Post Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
So I guess that there were NO SIGNS promoting the "day of silence" that was promoting the "gay agenda". She only brought her own sign. On a different day. Thus NOT interfering whatsoever.
You're missing the point.

It's like comparing a message of tolerance to a message of intolerance and condemnation.
Like comparing MLK talking about tolerance to somebody else talking about "white is right".
The two are not equivalent.

A public school is not the place to allow the students to marginalize each other in such a manner.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1
I personally believe that gayism like religion and morals should be VERY careful about its presentation to CHILDREN. In some cultures murder IS ACCEPTABLE.
Ahhh yes.
The comparison of homosexuality to murder.
Why shouldn't I have expected that absurd exaggeration...

Furthermore, this was a HIGH SCHOOL.
You talk of "children", but you ignore the fact that this "child" was 16 or 17.

And finally, I can't help but wonder about somebody who defends a "child" (as you want to put it) actively condemning homosexuality, but then talk about being "very careful about its (gayism) presentation".
Obviously, you want people who want TOLERANCE to be careful, while people who advocate intolerance don't have to be careful, right?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1
The problem comes from the fact that a SUB-culture insists on being mainstream and in-your-face instead of passive and unobtrusive. Sexuality is a PRIVATE thing NOT public.
This girl wore a shirt that was "in-your-face".
A day of silence is NOT "in-your-face".
A day of silence is obviously "passive and unobtrusive".

And quite frankly, I think that if you want sexuality to be "private", then you obviously condemn PUBLIC discrimination against gays, right?
Or do you support "in-your-face" issues like our government discriminating against gays, while gays should be "private" and take it without dissent?
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to foundit66 For This Useful Post:
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2008, 06:31 PM
crazyflamingos's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alabama
Gender: Female
Posts: 891
Thanks: 1,916
Thanked 370 Times in 249 Posts
Default Re: Anti-gay shirt fight continues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adept1 View Post
Sexuality is a PRIVATE thing NOT public.


That is an absurd statement.

Weddings are public.

Dating is often public.

School dances are public.

Engagement announcements are public.

Birth announcements are Public.

Entertainment venues -- from cartoons to opera -- are rife with examples of people acting out their sexuality. (If not actually acting out sex.)

Sex is a private thing.

Sexuality is not and never has been private.
__________________
Jesus Was A Liberal

If a certain course of action makes the mouth-breathers furious, then that’s a good policy. – The Practical Environmentalist
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to crazyflamingos For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.politicalwrinkles.com/civil-rights/1853-anti-gay-shirt-fight-continues.html
Posted By For Type Date
Political Wrinkles This thread Refback 01-12-2008 11:32 PM

Search Engine Optimization and SEO Tools
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0