Originally Posted by cnredd

Here's where it can go VERY awry...

If a third party is guilty of alienation of a spouse, then can he/she be held accountable for ATTEMPT also?...

If it's his/her fault for succeeding, then it should be also true of the same intentions even if he/she failed...

I don't see too much of a difference between "You honor, he ruined my marriage" and "Your honor, he TRIED to ruin my marriage."...

The intent is by the third party is equal...

So if this law can be used for alienation, it could (should) also be used for attempted alienation...

(Not agreeing with the law, but stringing it out to logical conclusions)...