I would say child sacrifice and abortion both equate to ass holes murdering infants, in any era.

Got some really bad news for you. Sacrificing of children for the good of adults has been practiced for thousands of years up to the present day. It is still being practiced today. Only the forms and justification have changed.

There is nothing bizarre, nothing warped about recognizing the commonality between ancient and contemporary child liquidation. The only difference is the technology.

__________________
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.

Odd that over the centuries of man kinds evolution, he has always found ways of controlling morality to the purpose of benefiting prosperity. Whether it is Mayans systematically conquering and sacrificing to imagined gods or modern Political leaders in conquest of wealth, power and genetic purity, the methods seem to be consistently the same. Attack and kill the weakest villagers and the children.

The villagers cannot resist much, the infants not at all. Such heroic prowess to chose them to give to the appropriate god of the day. Seems more like it is really a way to justify dealing with a problem by killing it rather than forming a useful solution.

The abortion of over 60 million souls in our nation is no different. Bless the practice however you justify such vileness, it is exactly the same outcome. And for the exact same reasons.

I would suggest that what ever god you worship, money, prosperity, self indulgence or vanity, it is a selfish act. Whether condoned or perpetuated by the Government, or a priest, it is the worst of evils when done to a child.

It really doesn't matter much if you are sacrificing a child's life for the convenience of it, for the overall economy of the society, or to fertilize the crops,,,; It's still the murder of the innocents. However, when it is at the consent of the church or state, at least a group of minds make the decision. Over time it becomes an accepted condition of life. But Abortion was not acceptable in the USA until the sad day of Roe V Wade.

I fear it has now become "acceptable."

When this is done systematical by the state or the church, it is evil in it's most efficient form. But having the individual woman determine the fate of a child without question, in a nation state that requires years of objection and pondering pause, by multiple legal minds, before executing capital punishment, is beyond understanding. Or redemption.

My issue with abortion remains the same. Legalize or not, it is murder/execution. In a truly "civilized" society, no one person should ever have, burden or bear that singular responsibility over the life of another.

__________________
I am going to hang a Batman Costume in my closet. .......... Just to screw with myself when I get alzheimer's.
sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura.

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, I AM A FREEMAN, THE DEMOCRATS WORST NIGHTMARE

So basically, you are saying that it is okay to murder another human being, if its continued presence is greatly inconvenient?

If I am misinterpreting your words, please explain to me just how that is the case...

__________________
"In his second inaugural address, [Franklin D.] Roosevelt sought 'unimagined power' to enforce the 'proper subordination' of private power to public power. He got it…"—George Will, July 8, 2007