Political Wrinkles  

Go Back   Political Wrinkles > Political Forums > Civil Rights & Abortion
Register FAQDonate PW Store PW Trivia Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Civil Rights & Abortion Discuss Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues at the Political Forums; Man removes feds’ spy cam, they demand it back, he refuses and sues Camera believed to be part of “Operation ...

Reply
 
Share LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2018, 09:36 PM
mr wonder's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Virginia
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,434
Thanks: 10,008
Thanked 6,195 Times in 4,211 Posts
Default Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Man removes feds’ spy cam, they demand it back, he refuses and sues
Camera believed to be part of “Operation Drawbridge” effort to monitor the border.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...ree-sues-feds/

Last November, a 74-year-old rancher and attorney was walking around his ranch just south of Encinal, Texas, when he happened upon a small portable camera strapped approximately eight feet high onto a mesquite tree near his son's home. The camera was encased in green plastic and had a transmitting antenna.
Not knowing what it was or how it got there, Ricardo Palacios removed it.
Soon after, Palacios received phone calls from Customs and Border Protection officials and the Texas Rangers. Each agency claimed the camera as its own and demanded that it be returned. Palacios refused, and they threatened him with arrest.
Palacios, who had run-ins with local CBP agents going back several years, took the camera as the last straw. He was tired of agents routinely trespassing on his land, and, even after complaining several times, he was frustrated that his grievances were not being heard.
As a possible way to ward off the threat of arrest, he sued the two agencies, along with a named CPB agent, Mario Martinez. Palacios accused them of trespass and of violating his constitutional rights.
"My client is 74 years old, he's a lawyer, been practicing for almost 50 years, he has no criminal history whatsoever, law-abiding citizen, respected lawyer and senior citizen," Raul Casso, one of the attorneys representing Palacios, told Ars. "To have put him in jail would have been—forget the indecency of it—what a way to end a career."
The camera now remains in Palacios' attorneys' possession while they are attempting to ask the case's judge to allow them to formally introduce it as evidence.
This federal lawsuit has raised thorny questions about the limits of the government's power to conduct surveillance—in the name of border security—on private property, without the landowner's permission.
"As a matter of policy, CBP does not comment on pending litigation," Jennifer Gabris, a CBP spokeswoman, emailed Ars.
The Texas Department of Public Safety similarly declined comment.
In court filings, Texas officials have claimed qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that protects law enforcement officials....

so does he have the right to remove unauthorized "gov't property" from his land?
And to tell gov't officials to stay off his property?
__________________
Hope is the dream of the waking man.
Aristotle

For there is hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease.
Job 14:6-8
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mr wonder For This Useful Post:
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2018, 09:56 PM
Dave1's Avatar
...Fair and Balanced...
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,754
Thanks: 3,936
Thanked 4,934 Times in 2,918 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post

so does he have the right to remove unauthorized "gov't property" from his land?
And to tell gov't officials to stay off his property?
I would like to pretend so but, realize not in todays deep state government control...

We have zero privacy or rights any longer in certain places and circumstances.....




Long but, worth the time and the information.....

https://youtu.be/rQouKi7xDpM
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave1 For This Useful Post:
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 09:51 AM
Manitou's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Gender: Male
Posts: 19,607
Thanks: 388
Thanked 6,041 Times in 4,380 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

The man has the right to rmove any governmenst shlt he haa not authorized to be placed on his property. He does live in America.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Manitou For This Useful Post:
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 12:08 PM
lurch907's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alaska, the greatest place on earth.
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,721
Thanks: 1,045
Thanked 3,100 Times in 1,782 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
so does he have the right to remove unauthorized "gov't property" from his land?
And to tell gov't officials to stay off his property?
Depends, we're only reading his side. Perhaps the feds had a warrant and/or suspect him of aiding illegals. Need more information to answer the question.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 12:37 PM
foundit66's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,593
Thanks: 10,097
Thanked 15,267 Times in 9,256 Posts
Post Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
so does he have the right to remove unauthorized "gov't property" from his land?
And to tell gov't officials to stay off his property?
Yes
And Yes.

You'll note the government's response...
The Texas Department of Public Safety similarly declined comment.

In court filings, Texas officials have claimed qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that protects law enforcement officials.
So the Texan officials don't claim they had a warrant.
They simply claim that they have protection from being sued when they break the law.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave1
I would like to pretend so but, realize not in todays deep state government control...

We have zero privacy or rights any longer in certain places and circumstances.....
It depends upon what resources the person involved has in order to fight back.
Most people will accept such transgression and realize it isn't worth the effort.
Some will provide some push-back and then get arrested for "resisting arrest" or similar nonsense. Only to later be released with the charges dropped. A convenient way to eliminate resistance to what the government demands but has no legal right to obtain...

And then there are some who have the resources to fight back. But habitually, their fight is an isolated outcome which doesn't change the actual unconstitutional modus operandi of the law enforcement.


In review, my response is a long-winded agreement with your comment.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave1
Long but, worth the time and the information.....
https://youtu.be/rQouKi7xDpM
I'll have to watch it later.
It amazes me how much the Democrats and Republicans play partisan antics to get the citizenry to avoid issues that they are bipartisan in violating our rights.
Democrat politicians will ask people to focus on issue X.
Republican politicians will ask people to focus on issue Y.
But then the citizenry gives no real comment to issue Z where both Democrat politicians and Republican politicians are working in harmony against the U.S. citizen...
(e.g. spying on citizenry)
__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to foundit66 For This Useful Post:
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 01:24 PM
lurch907's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alaska, the greatest place on earth.
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,721
Thanks: 1,045
Thanked 3,100 Times in 1,782 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
Yes
And Yes.

You'll note the government's response...
The Texas Department of Public Safety similarly declined comment.

In court filings, Texas officials have claimed qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that protects law enforcement officials.
So the Texan officials don't claim they had a warrant.
They simply claim that they have protection from being sued when they break the law.
Looks like a warrant may not be necessary depending on where the property in question is.

Quote:
8 U.S. Code § 1357 - Powers of immigration officers and employees

(a) Powers without warrant Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power without warrant—

3) within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States, to board and search for aliens any vessel within the territorial waters of the United States and any railway car, aircraft, conveyance, or vehicle, and within a distance of twenty-five miles from any such external boundary to have access to private lands, but not dwellings, for the purpose of patrolling the border to prevent the illegal entry of aliens into the United States;
If his land is within 25 miles of the border, his trespassing claim doesn't hold water.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 02:03 PM
mr wonder's Avatar
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Virginia
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,434
Thanks: 10,008
Thanked 6,195 Times in 4,211 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by lurch907 View Post
Looks like a warrant may not be necessary depending on where the property in question is.

Quote:
8 U.S. Code § 1357 - Powers of immigration officers and employees

(a) Powers without warrant Any officer or employee of the Service authorized under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General shall have power without warrant—

3) within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States, to board and search for aliens any vessel within the territorial waters of the United States and any railway car, aircraft, conveyance, or vehicle, and within a distance of twenty-five miles from any such external boundary to have access to private lands, but not dwellings, for the purpose of patrolling the border to prevent the illegal entry of aliens into the United States;
If his land is within 25 miles of the border, his trespassing claim doesn't hold water.
So the law says the constitution DOES NOT APPLY within 25 miles of the US boarder.
really. and you're Ok with that?

Somehow that law seems, well, flatly UNconstitutional and thus an ILLEGAL "law".

this is the main problem with all of the "laws", "codes", "Executive orders" "administrative memos", "court orders", secret actions and etc, that are made to supposedly "keep us safe" from Fill-in-the-blank boogieman.
__________________
Hope is the dream of the waking man.
Aristotle

For there is hope of a tree, if it be cut down, that it will sprout again, and that the tender branch thereof will not cease.
Job 14:6-8
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mr wonder For This Useful Post:
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 02:50 PM
RightofCenterLeftofCrazy
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Idaho
Gender: Male
Posts: 860
Thanks: 53
Thanked 659 Times in 380 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by lurch907 View Post
Looks like a warrant may not be necessary depending on where the property in question is.



If his land is within 25 miles of the border, his trespassing claim doesn't hold water.
35 miles

Edit: meaning, from the article, his land is 35 miles from the border.

Quote:
Palacios' ranch is situated at the 35-mile marker due north from Laredo
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 03:28 PM
lurch907's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alaska, the greatest place on earth.
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,721
Thanks: 1,045
Thanked 3,100 Times in 1,782 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
So the law says the constitution DOES NOT APPLY within 25 miles of the US boarder.
really. and you're Ok with that?

Somehow that law seems, well, flatly UNconstitutional and thus an ILLEGAL "law".

this is the main problem with all of the "laws", "codes", "Executive orders" "administrative memos", "court orders", secret actions and etc, that are made to supposedly "keep us safe" from Fill-in-the-blank boogieman.
Easy there, I didn't say I'm OK with it, I just said his claim that they were trespassing doesn't hold water. It's one of the reasons he is suing them, but it appears they were acting within the law.
I have no idea if the constitutionality of the law has been challenged, but I know the courts tend to give more than a little leeway on thing like this that concern national security.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2018, 03:46 PM
lurch907's Avatar
Scholar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alaska, the greatest place on earth.
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,721
Thanks: 1,045
Thanked 3,100 Times in 1,782 Posts
Default Re: Man removes feds’ spy cam they demand it back he refuses & sues

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenock View Post
35 miles

Edit: meaning, from the article, his land is 35 miles from the border.
The actual claim is he is at mile marker 35 of I-35 which starts at the border, however I-35 doesn't run a straight course nor does it run perpendicular to the border. He may be within 25 miles of the border.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
and, back, cam, demand, feds’, man, refuses, removes, spy, sues, they

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0