Originally Posted by winston53660
So tell me what is an activist judge?
Check with Shiva. He's the one who had it in his initial assertion.
You guys really need to go back to logic 101 here: the idea of qualifying initial assertions to begin with
rather than their rebuttals.
Originally Posted by foundit66
By simple definition, it's true...[indent]A constitutional court is a high court that deals primarily with constitutional law. Its main authority is to rule on whether laws that are challenged are in fact unconstitutional, i.e., whether they conflict with constitutionally established rights and freedoms.
And then I gave examples showing how its NOT true, across the board, (or if it IS true, then the knife cuts both ways) to which Shiva gave his no true scottsman fallacy in response.