View Single Post
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 04-13-2018, 08:30 AM
AZRWinger AZRWinger is offline
Conservative Sage
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 16,671
Thanks: 9,709
Thanked 10,239 Times in 6,238 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: SCOTUS Blocks Release of More Videos Exposing Planned Parenthood Aborted Baby

Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
Speaking of heavily editing people's statements ...

The key words are "simply "saying so"".
There are numerous other examples of the dishonesty discussed other than just PP pointing it out...

No. It's not.
And I'm not entertaining your topic derailment attempt any further.

Facts are simple.
PP has been investigated by numerous states.
Not one of them can document any illegal actions.

Examples like Weinstein are not relevant because there is no documentation on the Weinstein actual occurrences. Finances are documented. Weinstein accusations (for better or worse) turn into he said / she said which is much more nebulous. If they were documented like finances, it would be much more cut and dried!
Stick to the damn topic instead of this incessant derailment attempt to ignore the facts.

No. It does not.
Hillary is not convicted of fixing the nomination because no laws were broken. Period.
That's not a moral evaluation, but rather a demonstration of why your analogy breaks down and is a bad comparison. It's a bad analogy because her lack of conviction has no bearing as to whether she actually did it. It's based on the lack of legislation.
Even if she were guilty of the various claims against her, there is no law broken.

PP is NOT in that situation. If the charges were true, PP then broke the law.
That is why your analogy is crap.

Moreover, you are trying to use a bad analogy to avoid acknowledging THE FINANCE BOOKS PROVE THE CLAIM WRONG.

Because people can lie.

Are you for real right now?
You seriously think that just lying under oath automatically means that perjury charges will happen?

Just look at divorces where husbands and wives provide contradictory claims where inevitably at least one of them has to be lying. But nobody gets charged with perjury.

Yet again, you misrepresent my actual position.
The finance books are real documentation of how PP has made their money.
If PP has been profiting off of fetus parts, the evidence would be built off of the finance books. NOT just one disgruntled ex-employee.

You still cannot answer the question of WHY DO THE FINANCE BOOKS SHOW NO ILLEGAL ACTIVITY???
NONE of the state investigations of the PP books could show ANY illegal activities.

A snide response which completely fails to address the point made.
Remember, tax evasion is what they busted Capone on. By looking over his finances.
The area Capone could not hide were his finances.

The PP finances were reviewed.
NO EVIDENCE demonstrated that they actually had any illegal profit. They are legally allowed to seek compensation for actual expenses involved like transfer, storage, etc.
Again, PP doesn't produce audited financial statements for its abortion mill operations. The so-called investigations simply took PP at their word that revenues from baby parts sales did not exceed cost of goods sold. It is the kind of willful blindness that would have kept Bernie Madoff operating his Ponzi scheme untouched.

In the videos we see PP senior executives bargaining for the highest prices they can get for their grisly trade. We even see an executive refusing to give an opening price because as she says "that's a loser" followed by "I want a Lamborghini" . These remarks make no sense in a cost recovery scenario but make perfect sense in the context of for profit negotiations. But PP never did anything wrong just ask them.
What is a 30 something year old single man with a rock in one hand and a Honduran flag in the other?

An asylum seeker.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post: