View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2018, 11:17 AM
foundit66's Avatar
foundit66 foundit66 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,620
Thanks: 10,112
Thanked 15,316 Times in 9,287 Posts
Default Re: Democrat Candidate Jokes About Killing People Who Oppose Gun Confiscation

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
really? The truthful answer answer is that it's CLEARLY Implied it in the JOKE.
Again getting back to my assessment...

The guy's joke says they are dead.
DOES NOT give any insinuation as to how they became dead.

By this logic, if somebody says to a gay person (or sinner in general) that God will judge them, then obviously that's meant as a death threat...



Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
Which is the answer i already gave you .. like 3 times now.
but you disagree ,
It's really easy to say something is there that is not there.
You have claimed this multiple times, but it doesn't make it any less of a lie.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
In your mind the JOKE didn't IMPLY ANYTHING, ONLY what he said Afterwards counts. But if that's the case then he made a joke at all did he?
Yeah. He did. A very bad one nonetheless.
Gun enthusiasts sometimes say that you can take the gun from their cold dead fingers.
So that can be done...

I think the real problem here is that the gun culture (like NRA fear-mongering) has an innate level of violence inbred and therefore they are seeing this from their own perspective.
It's not an issue that the threat of murder is actually there, but you guys see it there because any talk of taking guns is a threat to you guys.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
But let me make it simple for you.
" they say '...take the gun from their cold dead hands' .. OK...." Says the Potential Chief Law enforcement officer.
And the people Laugh, WHY?
becasue the statement, the "joke" IMPLIES, refers to KILLING people to take their weapons.

Gun enthusiasts sometimes say that you can take the gun from their cold dead fingers.
So that can be done...
It's essentially a joke at taking the claim as an offer that you agreed we could have your gun after you were dead.

Again, bad joke, but it's there.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
He HAS TO CLARIFY that that in seriousness he ONLY means after they are dead... from causes he does NOT SPECIFY. Which i admittedly added could be Death by LEO as well.
so there's that.
Again, nowhere in his speech does he talk about violence to acquire guns.
But you guys want to assume that...


Quote:
Originally Posted by mr wonder View Post
but again i ask you not to assume my INTENTIONS or Motives you CLEARLY have ZERO IDEA what my motives and intentions are. you CONSISTENTLY assume BS about my thoughts. Youre not a mind reader, so get off that shtick. just stick to my words in there COMPLETE Context or um maybe FREAKIN' ASK what people meant by something before you assume BS.
First of all
Seriously. You need to reread your words and take them as your own guidance.
THIS WHOLE THREAD is about gun enthusiasts assuming intentions or motives about this guy's words. You guys are acting as mind-readers to assume something he did not say.

And then you have the gall to accuse others of that???


Secondly, if you can explicitly point out what you are talking about where I did that, I'm all ears.
Until then, this is a hollow accusation.
__________________
“Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.”
~Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote