View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2017, 08:53 AM
AZRWinger AZRWinger is offline
Conservative Sage
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 20,562
Thanks: 14,343
Thanked 15,696 Times in 8,969 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to AZRWinger
Default Re: Shep Smith Ruins The Right Wing Conspiracy on Hillary and Uranium

Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
Bloomberg View
Did Hillary Clinton cut a secret deal in 2010 to hand Russia 20 percent of the U.S.'s uranium deposits? Even Jeff Sessions is skeptical.
Red Alert, to respond to this post you are required to read!
Clinton Uranium 'Scandal' Doesn't Have Much Fuel
Ya gotta love how the standards of evidence required to even begin an investigation shoot up through the stratosphere when the Clinton's are a target. We see a relentless smear campaign against Trump based on anonymous sources and an unproven dossier as sufficient grounds to appoint a special prosecutor with a KGB like scope to get Trump. But the story of Uranium one and Clinton cash has to be discarded because absolute proof is required to begin a Federal investigation.

The sourcing on the story was, well -- "loose" would be a generous description: anonymous sources citing unnamed federal agents citing "a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry" who described a kickback scheme involving a U.S.-based uranium trucking company and a fuzzy "eyewitness account -- backed by documents" of a flood of millions into the coffers of the Clinton Foundation.
That's the article you linked claiming to debunk the scandal. Nothing to see here move along.

Let's see, Hillary's deputy claims she had no input into the decision to sell US uranium to the Russians so despite the fact she was in charge of the State department she bears no responsibility. The Clinton foundation didn't report the millions in payments it received at the time but later recalls when they were made with perfect clarity. The same FBI director at the time, now leading the Russian collusion witch hunt, didn't raise the alarm about the corruption associated with the Russian drive to corner the world's uranium supply. But really, take their word for it, there is nothing to see here.
If Democrats were confident their nominee actually received more than 80 million votes they wouldn't have more troops occupying Washington, DC than Lincoln had defending the city during the Civil War. Not Joe Biden, Kim Jung Biden.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AZRWinger For This Useful Post: