View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2017, 12:48 PM
jimbo jimbo is online now
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,956
Thanks: 6,865
Thanked 5,542 Times in 3,403 Posts
Default Re: Thoughts on Arms Ammo Magazine Capacity Legislated Restriction?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manitou View Post
I get Shiva's point as finding any type of excuse to push limited capacity on the population. If his type wants to have for example one of those fancy electronic guns that require voice activation, fingerprint, sphincter-tightening factor, fart detector, bullet limiter, et cetera, they are more than welcome to spend their money on that contraption. They do need to butt out of trying to convince people that less bullets mean better accuracy and finer specimen of sharpshooter marksman.
Manitou, I didn't get that from the post.

Arguably true but then I've always considered large magazines to be an indicator of poor marksmanship. I was taught to hunt as a boy with a single shot .22 rifle and with only one round you need to be able to hit the target every time. That's marksmanship.

I don't see anything advocating for or against large capacity magazines.

I happen to agree that if you are going to possess and carry, you should perhaps learn to operate.
Reply With Quote