Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
I didn't see what commentary was needed.
When the article says that Bush didn't lie, do I need to parrot that so people won't assume I believe he was lying?
|
I'd think you had SOME thoughts on the issue...considering you made it a thread...
Did you want the article to do your speaking for you?...
:
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
But now that I have stated my position, and you still haven't commented on it, allow me to repeat...
|
I did comment...I pointed out McClellan never said that Bush lied...
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
Bush was clueless as to what people were doing underneath him.
|
Are you asking for omniscience for our presidents now?...Do CEOs know what every employee does?...
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
He either didn't ask, which I qualify as incompetent, or he did ask and they lied to him, and then he provided no penalty, which I also qualify as incompetent.
|
Of course you would...
When somebody tells the president something, he can just look into his crystal ball, handed down from president to president, to learn the truth...
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
It boils down quite simply.
Either Bush knew what he was having repeated was inaccurate => lie. (I don't believe this option)
Or Bush did not know that what he was repeating was inaccurate. And considering the corruption was within his own house, that's pretty damn scary.
|
Considering the PRECONCEIVED notion of corruption created for partisan purposes, I could see how it's so easy for you to believe that...
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
So while Bush may have not lied, the alternative is hardly flattering...
|
Do you even understand why presidents have cabinet members and other personell?...