Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
As is typical in many of these threads, the subject starts out saying one thing, responses come along which misrepresent the point.
Interestingly enough, the original article I quoted stated, quite explicitly: " Peter Osnos of Public Affairs Books said Mr McClellan was not suggesting Mr Bush deliberately lied."
NOWHERE in the article I quoted does it say Bush "lied".
Stated false info? Yes.
And that is a PROVEN fact.
But then we get "this" response... 
And what "it" supposedly ended up being "false"?
Nothing that was actually stated in this thread.
And what was ACTUALLY STATED which is false?
Never mind. I don't expect a response...
Nobody said "Bush lied".
But once again, somebody has responded with a strawman to ignore the bigger issue.
Bush's administration had a hand in this, and BUSH WAS CLUELESS.
So some people can complain that "Bush didn't lie" in order to overlook the bigger issue. Bush has CORRUPTION IN HIS CAMP and is IGNORANT cause he cannot even run the people that work closest to him...
That direct enough for you?  |
Excuse me for making an attempt to look at where you were going with this, but YOU did not supply any commentary...making us readers try to figure out your thoughts...
So what did I do?...I simply went by what I already know about the story...
And here's what I know...
News outlets have already made the claim that "Bush lied" publicly pertaining to this story...
Here's just one example...
McClellan: Bush lied about Valerie Plame - MSN Video
Quote:
McClellan: Bush lied about Valerie Plame
Nov. 20: A new book by former White House press secretary Scott McClellan says President Bush and Dick Cheney lied to him about Valerie Plame. NBC's David Shuster reports.
|
Watch the video...It mentions someone lying every few seconds...including the president multiple times...
So forgive me if that wasn't the angle you were going for, but since there was no personal thoughts in your post, I'm relegated to figure it out on my own...