View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2013, 07:59 PM
Surly's Avatar
Surly Surly is offline
PW Enlightenment
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Midwest
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,253
Thanks: 2,797
Thanked 3,061 Times in 2,394 Posts
Default Re: Court: Govít Must Halt Enforcement of Sterilization-Contraception-Abortifacient M

Wait, I really am confused about this. What is the difference? Looking at this from HL or the Catholic Church's POV. If I hired an employee and paid for his insurance and wages why am I more ethically responsible if the employee decided to use his insurance to obtain contraceptives or if he paid for it out of his regular pay. Both are benefits to the employee, which are or should be out of my control.
Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
If you think the company has a right to tell employees how to spend their own money then you are in favor of the hobby lobby ruling. They don't pay the insurance or the premiums or the out of pocket co pay. The employee does.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Surly For This Useful Post: