View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2012, 03:30 PM
faithful_servant's Avatar
faithful_servant faithful_servant is offline
PW Enlightenment
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beautiful conservative Central Oregon
Gender: Male
Posts: 19,291
Thanks: 6,030
Thanked 8,054 Times in 5,528 Posts
Default Re: The Himalayas and nearby peaks have lost no ice in past 10 years, study shows

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedState View Post
Yep, and Al Gore is behind it all.
Gore is one of the primary people pushing this agenda. The guy has made over $100,000,000 trading carbon credits and there's NO science to back up the FACT that anthropogenic CO2 causes GW. There simply isn't enough of it to cause the kind of changes that being touted. That's simple, hard science. It's not computer modeled projections that can be manipulated to get results, it's a simple fact obtained by measuring the amount of atmosphere we have, the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere and the amount of impact that CO2 has on the greenhouse effect. All of these are well known and documented pieces of information and the net effect of anthropogenic CO2 is less than the normal annual variation in CO2 levels. In other words, we don't produce enough CO2 to make a change that can be measured since the amount of CO2 we produce is less than the natural variation in CO2 levels.

Quote:
Total atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) -- both man-made and natural-- is only about 3.62% of the overall greenhouse effect
Quote:
0.117% of the greenhouse effect is due to atmospheric CO2 from human activity
Quote:
Water vapor, responsible for 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect, is 99.999% natural (some argue, 100%). Even if we wanted to we can do nothing to change this.

Anthropogenic (man-made) CO2 contributions cause only about 0.117% of Earth's greenhouse effect, (factoring in water vapor). This is insignificant!

Adding up all anthropogenic greenhouse sources, the total human contribution to the greenhouse effect is around 0.28% (factoring in water vapor).




Global Warming: A closer look at the numbers
Reply With Quote