Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael1
He doesn't get to weasel out just because he was responsing to a question. It is what he said that matters, not how he came to say it.
Obviously Clark lacks the political experience to not stick his foot in his mouth, because his candidate has the same amount of 'executive experience' as McCain. Obviously, the follow up question to Clark should have been, 'If John McCain isn't qualified because of his lack of executive experience, how could Barack Obama be qualified?'
I agree, and I certainly wouldn't vote for McCain for his military service alone.
I do question Obama's wisdom in his choice of surrogates. Why the hell would you send someone out on television who believes you're not qualified to be President?
How can you be willing to vote for a man who chooses people to represent him that don't really believe he's qualified???
|
You know whats funny. If Clark would have started with the qualifier "We salute John for his service blah blah blah" And then said that John experiences as serious as they were do not qualify him Blah Blah Blah. It was inartful of him. And it came out a bit disrespectful. I assume he will apologize for his mis statement. LOL Thats what the call it now when you stick your foot in your mouth. But I don't think it was calculated. And Obama has already addressed it fully.