View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2008, 01:34 PM
Mikeyy's Avatar
Mikeyy Mikeyy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern California
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,810
Thanks: 533
Thanked 1,129 Times in 813 Posts
Default Re: U.N. nuclear watchdog chief, military strike on Iran

Quote:
Originally Posted by faithful_servant View Post
The docs that Iraq sent were pure fabrication. That's why they were never seriously considered as proof. We had spent 12 years getting the run-around from the Baathists and this was nothing more than more of the same. It was a stalling tactic, trying to garner public sympathy from well-meaning "folks" like yourself. Had we waited, how many more Iraqi women would have been
gang-raped becuase thier husbands stood up against the Baathists? How many more mass graves would have been found? How many more Iraqis would have been "processed" through the Iraqi death factories like Abu Ghraib?
First, You can't win the argument by saying that they were bad people. Secondly, The documents were right. But its funny that you find them lacking. When the info we did rely on came from Chalabi and what was that informants name? "Curveball" I mean come on man. Their info was dead wrong. Lets not start rewriting history here. There is too much documentation.
Reply With Quote