Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeyy
We are going to disagree. I think she is good at bluffing. I can't think of any successful policy with her name on it. She was backing Israels attacks in Lebennon. Cluster bombs in populated areas is illegal. But Condi backed it. She refused to listen to people she felt were beneath her prior to 9-11. Richard Clarke tried to get her attention to no avail. Then when she was given an intelligence report about the threat she ignored it because she said it didn't give the the actual plans. Flight schedules and the like. She didn't follow up on the report either. In fact what was keeping her so busy. After all that was her job. NSC. That was the only thing she should have been doing in her position. So again, What was keeping her too busy to pay attention to intelligence reports.
|
What can I say? Those were my impressions of her. If she is lying about any of the pre 9-11 stuff, then that opens the door to one great big conspiracy theory.