Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66
You have this boring tactic of saying "no response" when one WAS given.
Sticking your head in the sand and saying "no response", "no response" again just removes your credibility.
|
When there is no response or a diversion I will point it out.
Quote:
And to say it again, since Obama has already stated no discussions with terrorists, your repeated questions regarding "OBL and alQaeda" just show you haven't a clue what you're complaining about.
Your complaint is not real.
|
He has said repeatedly he will sit down and talk with our enemies, that we should talk with our enemies, that it is a sign of strength when you sit down and talk with your enemies. That we should pull out of Iraq and talk, well who are you going to talk to when you talk with our enemies?
Quote:
He said he would be willing to talk to countries.
He has also said he will not talk to terrorists.
That is what he ACTUALLY said.
|
Obama: America 'has to talk to its enemies'
As the Democratic CNN/Univision debate kicked off Thursday night, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) faced off over Cuba, with Obama reiterating his position that America "
has to talk with its enemies," with Clinton holding to an earlier position that no president should meet with Cuba's new leader unless conditions are met.
The Raw Story | Obama: America 'has to talk to its enemies'
Quote:
What did he vote "present" on rather than take a position?
You're talking out your arse, as he had the courage to vote "no" on Iraq.
|
ROFL he WASN'T IN THE SENATE WHEN THEY VOTED!!!!!!!
Quote:
|
Quit making stupid crap up.
|
Me make stuff up how about the above.
Quote:
|
al Qaeda was not in Iraq before we invaded, so your assessment is once again false...
|
Yes they were and Saddam wanted to further his ties with them and was meeting with them as the study releaased earlier this year once again confirmed.
Saddam's Dangerous Friends
But the more salient point is that al Qaeda has been decimated because they made Iraq the larger front in the war........and we defeated them.
Quote:
|
You obviously have no imagination, and no concept of international diplomacy.
|
Obviously more than you.
Quote:
|
Again, all you're doing is repeating what you said, cowardly avoiding even commenting on what I said.
|
I am commenting DIRECTLY on what you stated, it took NO courage on Obama's part. The man who could not even stand up to the racial hatred in his own church has never shown an courage of any kind.
Quote:
I challenge you to show me where Obama has REFUSED action as a response to an ACTUAL threat.
Quote:
And what's truly stupid about your reply is it is so easy for me to shoot you down.
The Raw Story | Obama warns he would attack Al-Qaeda in Pakistan"Democratic White House hopeful Barack Obama warned Wednesday that if elected president he would be prepared to order military strikes against Al-Qaeda in Pakistan, even if Islamabad objects."
|
Pakistan hasn't threatend us, they are a soverign state and he is proposing a preemptive strike against them. But the fact is we are already fighting al Qaeda there, it's not for him to propose.
You think the U.S. president paying a visit to say "knock it off" gives the country prestige?
I'm talking to you, and that sure as heck doesn't give YOU any credibility, does it?
Quote:
Nothing.
Just saving a quote for later when you get busted...
Link me to the national independent party web-site...
How is what I said a "lie"?
Is this similar to that nonsense where if somebody uses the word "you", then it's an attack?
Cause I think that position of yours would be more of a "lie" than what I actually said...
|
I told you I am an independent, for you to say otherwise knowing the fact is now a lie.
Quote:
< yawn >
If a voter supports only Republicans, how is that "independent"?
|
How doese voting for candidates other than Republicans make one a Republican?
Quote:
You did? Where?
And "independent of party"?
That's like buying only Ford throughout your life, and then insisting you're not partial.
|
Give me your proof that I have always voted for only Republicans. You are making a statement of fact about me so back it up.
Then go look up Don Siegleman whom I voted for for governor.
You had the fallcious belief that a conserviative could not be an independent that only liberals could be independent, and that is not true. Being an independent has nothing to do with political phiolosophy it concerns party affiliation. There is a difference.