Originally Posted by jamesrage

Of course pro-illegals are going to say the term is pejorative,derogatory or dehumanizing.It you notice the source for those claims are liberal pro-illegals newspapers.

Anchor baby - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
. These terms have been characterized in the San Diego Union-Tribune as "pejorative"[1], in the New York Times as "derogatory"[2], and in the Chicago Tribune as dehumanizing.[3]


I could care less what a pro-illegal says about the term anchor baby.Pro-illegals also try to claim the term "illegals" or "illegal aliens" is pejorative,derogatory or dehumanizing.




Yes there is.Read the article.That why I want to end the law that allows chain migration of relatives other than minor children or spouse.


It still doesn't change the fact illegals give birth to children here in the US to facilitate future chain migration.


Thats part of why the child of an illegal is called a anchor baby.






If we changed the INS act of 1965 to deny chain migration to relatives other than spouse and minor children it will not have an effect on birth right citizenship.This would be an easier approach than trying to change and or repeal the 14th amendment.