View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 11:01 PM
jamesrage's Avatar
jamesrage jamesrage is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: A place where common sense still exist.
Gender: Male
Posts: 107
Thanks: 3
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Default Should the INS Act of 1965 be changed to end anchor baby births?

Should the immigration nationality act of 1965 be changed or repealed to end anchor baby births?


It is not a fool proof solution but how about repealing and or changing the immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 that allows chain migration of individuals other than spouses and minor children.Before this chain migration was only used for minor children and spouses.This doesn't require a change in the constitution at all.Technically this would end future anchor baby births.ALthough there would still be illegal aliens popping out babies but those children would not be able to drag the whole entire family here to the US.


Anchor baby - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Anchor baby or jackpot baby are terms used to refer to a child born in the United States to illegal immigrants or other non-citizens. The terms refer to the role of an illegal alien's child, as a US citizen, in facilitating chain migration under the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
__________________
"There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”—Theodore Roosevelt

Reply With Quote