Pray allow me to bask in your "superior" understanding of science by elaborating on theory and laws.


How very medieval an outlook. So it is written and taught so it must be true. I read something somewhere about the greatest failure to try. Perhaps you might want to take this advice to heart by trying to understand the alternative theories to Darwinism or at least it's faults.

No, the idea of a deity has corporeal world ramifications. In the absence of a Creator we have no unalienable rights, which explains Darwinisms attractiveness for Progryssves. Moreover Darwinism provides a pretext for licensing abortion and rationing medical care in the name of "natural" selection. As Darwin wrote resources spent on the poor and unfortunate are wasted from a survival of the fittest perspective. This philosophy gives rise to the modern version of "selections" like those of the Nazi's without the fuss and muss of large-scale concentration camps.

So that is why Darwin's book expounding on his theory was "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life"? We ought to indoctrinate our children at State schools with Darwin's atheism and racism as controvertible fact. But turn them away when they ask how life began. I am sure the course content has changed somewhat since I attended school in the dark ages but our teachers and scientists nattered on about the primordial soup giving rise to the first single celled organism by some chance concurrence of circumstances that just happen to support Darwin's theory. No doubt this article of Progryssve faith has been dressed up to appeal to today's students but that doesn't make it any less questionable.