Quote:
Originally Posted by bhkad
"One of the great tragedies of the Bush administration is that "the more successful they've been at intercepting and stopping bad guys, the less proof there is that we're in danger. Therefore, the better they've done at making sure there isn't an attack, the easier it is to say, 'well, there was never going to be an attack anyway!'"
-- Newt Gingrich on BookTV at a book signing for "Days of Infamy" 5/11/08 |
I suppose what you mean is that there hasn't been an attack on the U.S,. You could have said the same thing five years after the first WTC attack. Which I believe was successfully prosecuted.
And BTW the thread says Bush suggests Obama wants 'appeasement' of terrorists. Now appeasement means many things. Not all negative if you actually read the definitian. But everyone knows what the attack machine is insinuating.