Funny how you quote the "will of the people", but if it goes against what Bush wants, then suddenly you realize that the "will of the people" isn't always supreme...

When the "will of the people" wishes to discriminate without a legitimate state interest, and the law allows it, the country doesn't deserve the claims to "equality" or "freedom".

The "will of the people" was thwarted in Loving v Virginia as well, the court case that knocked out miscegenation laws. Would you rather have had the "will of the people" win out and discrimination continue to be enforced?

Or is that just a standard you have when you AGREE with the discrimination at hand...