View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2008, 11:58 PM
saltwn's Avatar
saltwn saltwn is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: small town in the Northwest- population 400 (+2)
Posts: 5,148
Thanks: 2,453
Thanked 1,466 Times in 1,019 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to saltwn
Default Re: Anti-abortion display stirs up controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyflamingos View Post
All of which does not change the fact that any student or university employee who was not affiliated with either the sponsor or with the issuance of permits had no way of knowing that it was not an act of vandalism.

I might be proud of drawing a portrait of George Washington on someone's lawn with colorful plastic forks but, without permission. it would be vandalism.
That isn't exactly a fair comparison. There might be a painting of Washington or even some vulgar work of art in a campus area at any given time. Who sponsors them? Probably the art or drama department, but maybe a club. Students and professors don't ask who sponsored it unless they are interested in what it represents. They merely react to it.
__________________


________________________________________
Salty

THANKSGIVING MENUS AND TIPS

A GREAT PLACE TO SHOP
Reply With Quote