I confused about how she has a case...
Quote:
|
Tanya Andersen alleges the way the RIAA goes pursuing people is illegal
|
But earlier, it reads that she was sued by the RIAA and vindicated...
It doesn't say WHY she was vindicated...
If she was vindicated BECAUSE it was found that the RIAA used "illegal investigative practices", then the allegation wouldn't be an allegation...it would be a fact...There would already be court documents on it...