
04-25-2008, 10:47 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southern California
Gender:
Posts: 3,860
Thanks: 547
Thanked 1,158 Times in 832 Posts
|
|
Re: Wright breaks silence, says attacks 'unfair'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spencer Collins
So you and I and "others" will just have to agree to disagree on this stories "relevance" in November. I may end up voting for Obama,yes..it's possible. I have various concerns with all the candidates not just one of them.Are other issues more important than the Wright controversy? Of course they are but again..elections are won and lost in the magins.This story may have some effect on "Independents" and "Obmakins",they are Republicans who are for Obama. Can he afford to lose people from these groups? NO. A black candidate has enough riding against him without these hit pieces but they WILL continue as McCain will soon find out.Past associations "may" seem trivial to some but not all. Obama has already and "suddenly" distanced himself from Wright's comments. If Obama gets the nomination,will McCain and his surrogates drop this story? Not in your life...it will be good cop bad cop all the way to November. McCain's surrogates will attack Obama and he will distance himself from the attacks..We've all seen this type of thing before,it's poltics 101.I can't believe people when they say past associations don't matter unless they mean "their" candidates past associations don't matter. What about the "opposing" candidate's past associations? Obama is smart but not that smart..he has his surrogates do the attacking and likes to appear above the Frey but "who" is he really fooling? This is not a new political strategy.
The only "changes" I've seen in politics are the names,ethnicity and gender of the candidates..
We will wait a long time before candidates refuse to make an issue out of past associations.Hillary..a fellow Democrat..is responsible for most of these attacks.Wait till Obama gets the nomination,the Republicans will prove even more aggressive than Hillary,they will be relentless.
|
I agree the politics of it are not good. But like I said before, what can he do about it but what he did. He condemned them in the strongest terms. He did all of the things the unwritten rules call for regarding this except condemn the man himself. Your right about how it plays politically. But again like we talked about before. There is a new paradigm playing out here. People don't seem to be as easliy swayed as they were. They see phoney issues a little easier then they used to. At least thats what I am always hoping for. And BTW I was just thinking. I still don't know who I will vote for.
|