Re: Will Democratic Socialism Destroy our Republic?
As for your questions. I lean left so I will answer for you.
You don't "lean left" - you ARE left.
1. Right to life. You have a right to life and liberty and the persuit of happiness.
One million innocent American infants each year for more than 40 years, do NOT have a fundamental right to life. But every woman has a right to murder. If the mother murders, you call it abortion. But what do you call it when the father murders?
2.I have guns. You can have guns too.
Tell this to people who live in the most dangerous cities in America, Washington DC and New York, both of which outlaw private gun rights.
3.If your happiness is a crime I'm against it.
Earning more than my neighbor is now a crime, one that must be punished by taking away rightful earnings (happiness) of one, and purchasing the votes of others with those funds. The more you make, the more we take... Success is the only crime and democrats won't have it in America. We must all be "equal." Marx said so.
4. You can have all the religion you want. Thats the agreement for being an American. You can practice all the religion you want as long as I am not required to be involved. So enjoy.
No Christ in Christmas on the public square, for fear of offending the 3% of Americans who believe in nothing at all, while teaching the Quran in public schools in the name of "history" and "tolerance" to Islam, and you think you have freedom of religious expression? Do you know that the Bible was the first book placed in every public library by the founders? Or that almost every founder warned that the system they designed was only suitable for a MORAL society capable of self-governance?
5, You can have all the property you want as far as I'm concerned. I don't remember that as being a right. And who tried to stop you?
Ever heard of Kelo? Your guns, your land, your earnings, they are all your property. You don't know that at the base of freedom is property rights? No wonder you're a liberal.
Like all liberals, you offered factually inaccurate rhetoric, and completely avoided answering the questions. WHERE DO DEMOCRATS STAND ON THESE FUNDAMENTAL AMERICAN RIGHTS? GO READ THEIR CAMPAIGN WEB SITES AND THEIR VOTING RECORDS AND TELL US WHERE THEY STAND ON THESE AMERICAN RIGHTS?
And as usual you guys always change the subject to Clinton. Lets stay with one POTUS at a time. Your POTUS. The one who has broken the law. The one who got the telecoms to join him in breaking the law. And I am so tired of reading socialist this and that. I am not afraid of a socialist idea if it works. Like the interstate system for example.
You don't like it when your overt hypocrisy is highlighted, do you. You also don't like dealing in fact based reality. The NSA program you speak of is directed only at international communications, where foreign terror cells are attempting to communicate with cells inside America. It did not involve "wire tapping" but "data mining." And the new laws making it "legal" were passed because the FISA law passed decades ago, did not cover modern technologies like email and blogging. So once again, you refuse to directly answer the questions, offer bogus arguments based on inaccurate facts and dodge the real issue. Tell us the difference between what Hitlery and Obambi are selling and what Marx, Alinsky and Lenin were selling.
Those who refuse to study the past are doomed to repeat it and you are well on your way.
|