Quote:
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
Your twisting the language by claiming sex is a biological imperative like maintaining a core body temperature.
|
I am twisting nothing.
I am responding to the statements of OTHER POSTERS and what they have claimed.
You are obviously free to make your own assessment, but don't accuse me of "twisting" anything just cause you want to change the subject...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
Sex is an imperative for the survival of the species, duh; in terms of individual survival it's not required.
|
That is not the sole reason, and that is part of the point of all this.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
Sex is not limited to procreation, duh. The constellation of factors responsible for sex drive including volition isn't on a timeclock so they vanish once the body is past procreation.
|
Do you fail to see
that is part of my point?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
But, look at people considered sex symbols, overwhelmingly they are young people of procreative age.
|
Skinniness is also seen as "sexy" by some, yet it can be counter-productive in helping to establish a more optimal mate choosing for the purposes of procreation.
Furthermore, a 30-year old is also viable for procreation.
So is it intelligent to disregard a 30-year old woman for a 20-year old woman, for the purposes of procreation?
A man in his younger, "sexier" years is typically of only moderate means to supply for a procreate family.
So doesn't it make more sense to find a more mature man as "sexy", for the capability to provide?
You take one aspect of this shallow thing we call "beauty" and try to pretend that it somehow is about procreation.
It isn't.
Tell the average person that the woman he is lusting after can not have kids and find how the lust doesn't even change...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
You are correct the law must treat everyone equally. That's not the same as the law treating all behaviors equally. In fact, the law's function is to "discriminate" against certain behaviors.
|
I never said the law must treat all behaviors equally.
However, the legal precedent establishing homosexuality as something that should be treated equally is irrefutable.
Romer v Evans.
Lawrence v Texas.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
I agree so you should stop making histronic claims.
|
If that ain't the pot calling the kettle black.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AZRWinger
I note you edited out the text in my comment where I recognized the statement was extreme and the point was to expose the logical absurdity of the claim made in the earlier comment.
|
Your comment was extreme to the point that it should never have been made.
If I said "Poster_X is trying to revive Hitler's death camps", and then turned around and pointed out my comment was extreme, that does nothing to excuse how ridiculously and pointlessly extreme the comment was.
Saying "That was extreme" does not help to validate the original claim when it is so ridiculously out there that it says more about the speaker than the status quo.