I saw the sarcasm.
I am amused you claimed I didn't see your sarcasm, while you completely missed mine!

I also saw you run away from the issue.
Like many things, you tried to work in the assumption of validity of the claim while you cowardly avoided any attempt to substantiate the claim.

Would you care to justify the claims on "attack on the family"?
Or would you mind admitting that any real "attacks" on the "family" come primarily from heterosexuals who have gutted the legal status of "marriage" so that it's ridiculously easy to obtain a divorce?

Would you care to examine with me the actual STATUS of marriages in red and blue states? Comparing the fact that the divorce rate in BLUE states is MUCH BETTER than that of the red states?


It gets REALLY boring to see you toss out strawman arguments which you proclaim I believe.
But you lack the intelligence or the reading comprehension to honestly admit when I explicitly state that those items are NOT my belief or position.

1) The "family" needs work. But unfortunately, "some" people toss around their prejudices as the cause of "family" woes when they lack the intellectual honesty and base courage to admit and address the real problems.

2) I whole-heartedly am concerned regarding terrorism and al Qaeda.
I think your real question should be asked of George Bush, who said the following regarding Osama bin Laden: "I truly am not that concerned about him."

3) Quite frankly, it's irrelevant whether or not Bush has wire-tapped ANYTHING in my life. He has been in charge for illegal wire-tapping.
That you don't even try to refute. You only try to obfuscate the issue by talking about whether or not he tapped MY phone...

Clinton never slept with you, your wife, or any of your family. Does that mean his actions don't concern you?