Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun
I cannot from a purely biological standpoint separate homosexuality from zoophilia and pedophilia.
|
That's interesting since the scientific community pretty much comes to different consensus. Zoophilia is disordered because an attraction to an incongruous morphology is an extreme abnormality that often has both organic and psychological factors. Pedophilia is considered disordered because the attraction to prepubescence suggests a domination and power need coupled with an extreme sexual insecurity...perhaps even sexual performance maladies.
Quote:
|
To justify homosexuality as a normal biological norm, you have to suspend human outward physiology, internal bodily systems, and most importantly reproduction.
|
Really? So reproduction has to be the goal of every sexual coupling or there is some kind of malady attributed to the coupling? Interesting...
Quote:
|
If you do that, from a biological standpoint, there is NO difference between having sex with a sheep, child, or your own gender.
|
That's a complete falsehood. Sheep have an incongruous morphology. The prepubescent lack functionality needed to stimulate sexual pleasure, besides being injurious to the child both psychologically and physically.
Quote:
|
If we consider those things disordered, I don't see how homosexuality isn't disordered as well.
|
I hope maybe I helped show you the difference. For some reason, I am getting the distinct impression that you did some fantastic logical somersaults to put that argument together and so you won't be willing to abandon it after all that work.
Quote:
|
Consent and legal have no bearing on biological. How's that for rantings of a crazy?
|
I'm not saying you are crazy. I am of the impression that you Frankensteined an argument together to support what you already believed rather than arriving at a conclusion supported by fact.
I will read the doctor you reference when I get back from lunch.