Quote:
Originally Posted by dabateman
Just because we don't accept certain traits, doesn't mean that they aren't natural. A failing in your understanding. Beyond that, you have yet to show the negative impact of homosexuality. I can show the negative impact of 'paraphilias', but homosexuality is not classified as a paraphillia.
So I'll give you your proof when you give me mine. Dear FX, what proof do you have that homosexuality will harm society or the individual.
|
What is the true negative aspect of necrophilia from a biologic standpoint? Dead is pretty much dead. You decompose and grass grows on ya. There's no negative there. The family might not "like" it. But biologically, there's no real harm in it.
What's the harm in golden showers? Peeing on each other has no negative really. It's just pee.
What more harm to animals is sex than slaughter. We are omnivorous....
But really, that's placing the sex as the determining factor. I think the fact that there is no real "why" to homosexuality points to it's disorder. And the fact that there are "other" partner urges, not to mention total gender misapplication, point even more to the fact that the human/mammalian/animal sexual psyche is just prone to defect.
Not to mention the coincidence that paraphilia and sexual dysfunction is general is more prevalent in men, just like homosexuality, points to something being "amiss".
But you know what, this ain't the thread for this discussion. So unless to want to derail your own thread, make up a new one and link me to it. I'll gladly banter with ya.