View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008, 10:31 AM
foundit66's Avatar
foundit66 foundit66 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,685
Thanks: 1,658
Thanked 2,844 Times in 1,872 Posts
Post Re: How to be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd View Post
It takes time away from IMPORTANT things...
Did you go to college?
Do you know how "ELECTIVES" work?

It's redundant how some will complain loudly about even the slightest presence of gay culture. A perception. A discussion.

Is this class replacing calculus?
Do YOU or ANYBODY ELSE HAVE TO take it???

Then why the hell are you complaining?


Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd
I don't know if it includes the part where any straight person who disagrees with even the slightest part of any homosexual activity, whether physical, political, or otherwise, will be immediately deemed an outrageous, religiuos-zealot homophobe bent on destroying every gay person who ever lived...
I have found that the people who complain about gays are more prone to complain about being called a "religious-zealot homophobe" than they are to be called a "religious-zealot homophobe".
I've done the math on this board and others with handy-dandy search engines, and typically found that the "complainers" use the word a LOT more often, unprompted, then the "gays".
Typically, a LOT of the use of the gays using the word comes IN REPLY to the "complainer" using it first...

The complaint is a tool employed to try to belittle the classification, to make people ignore the ACCURACY of the term when it is used...

And furthermore, like the "Bush haters" complaint, it's meaningless. If a person is a "religious-zealot homophobe", that no more justifies any counter-argument than it does somebody being a "Bush hater"...
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to foundit66 For This Useful Post: