View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2021, 12:29 PM
pjohns pjohns is offline
PW Enlightenment
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tennessee
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,794
Thanks: 15,631
Thanked 5,497 Times in 3,512 Posts
Default Re: At Supreme Court, Center Attorney Defends Precedent, Roe, the Right to Liberty, a

Originally Posted by saltwn View Post
The law was defended y two lawyers out to make a name for themselves, damn the torpedos, full speed ahead. All that was needed was to clarify that doctors- at that time working in an obgyn setting, could ply their own trade with the knowledge they took so many years to obtain. But along came the Texas Baptists and sai8d 'hold my beer.' Women suffered. And it didn't save any babies. That's what you get when you bend over backward for religious nuttery; a bad law with women still suffering w/o proper health care in clinics and still no babies saved.
You have noted exactly why you consider this to have been a bad decision.

But you have not addressed the real point, viz.: Why do liberals yell "precedent" and "settled law" when they like a decision, yet ignore that when they dislike it?

Does this not seem to you like a glaring double standard?
"In his second inaugural address, [Franklin D.] Roosevelt sought 'unimagined power' to enforce the 'proper subordination' of private power to public power. He got it…"—George Will, July 8, 2007
Reply With Quote